0
NO!
NOTE: There is a trick involved here ... to find if a number is divisible by 3, add all the digits together (in this case, 1+0+4+7+4 = 16.)
16 is not exactly divisible by 3, so 10474 is not either!
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is 412 divisble by 3?
No.
3 digit number divisible by 2 3 and 6?
888 because 8 is divisble by 2 and 8+8+8 is 24 24 is divisible by 3 then it is divisible by 2 and 3 then it is divisble by 6....
Is 1842 divisble by 3?
yes you can divide it 1842 divided by 3 = 614
What is a number between 400 and 500 that is divisble by 3 but not 2?
456
42 is divisble by what numbers 14 8 5 9?
It is: 42/14 = 3
Is 414 equally divisble by 3?
Yes, 414 divided by 3 = 138 exactly.
Is 17000 exactly divisble by 5?
no
Is 710 divisble by 8?
Not exactly because it is 88.75
Is 587 divisble by 8?
Not exactly because it is 73.375
Is 412 divisble by 3?
No.
Is 31 divisble by 3?
No
Is 454 divisble by 3?
No.
Is 998876 divisble by 3?
no
Is 121 divisble by 3?
NO.
Is 677 divisble by 3?
Nope... to check if a number will divide by 3 - add the digits of the number together. In this case, 6+7+7=20, which will not divide exactly by three.
Is 2690 divisble by 3?
No it is not. To check - add all the digits together (in this case 2+6+9=17. If the sum of the digits can be divided exactly by 3, then the number itself will also divide by 3. In this case, 17 (the sum of the digits) does not divide exactly by 3.
What is 72 divisble by?
2 & 3
