Oh, dude, like, 108 is not a perfect square because when you try to find its square root, you get a decimal, not a whole number. Perfect squares are like those popular kids in high school - they're the cool ones with whole number square roots, you know? 108 is more like the quirky kid who hangs out in the math club.
200 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
A perfect square is a square of an integer (a whole number).
36
Then the number is called a "perfect square".Then the number is called a "perfect square".Then the number is called a "perfect square".Then the number is called a "perfect square".
No, 15 is not a perfect square.
Maybe
108 square feet = 12 square yards.
108 square feet = 10.03 square meters.
The square root of 108 is not an integer - rounded to five decimal places, sqrt(108) = ±10.39230.
108 sq metres.
108 square feet (9 x 12 = 108).
200 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
It is just possible that it is 108 square feet!
Before you try to factor that number, you have a couple of insurmountableproblems just finding it.-- there is no such thing as the square root of a negative number, unlessyou know how to work with 'i', the unit 'imaginary' number;-- 108 is not a perfect square number, so it's not even possible to write itsexact square root.About the best you can do is:(6 i) x sqrt(3)
To find the square footage from a given length in feet, you need to multiply the length by itself to get the area in square feet. In this case, 108 feet would be equal to 108 multiplied by 108, which equals 11,664 square feet.
No, 325 is not a perfect square however 324 is a perfect square.
A perfect square is a square of an integer (a whole number).