If sum of digits of a number is divisible by 3 then the number is divisible by 3. Sum of digits = 1+3+4+5+6 = 19 and 19 is not divisible by 3.
So 13456 is not divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
1x6,743 not divisible by 2 no its not divisible by 3????
If this is a T-F question, the answer is false. It is true that if a number is divisible by 6, it also divisible by 3. This is true because 6 is divisible by 3. However, the converse -- If a number is divisible by 3, it is divisible by 6, is false. A counterexample is 15. 15 is divisible by 3, but not by 6. It becomes clearer if you split the question into its two parts. A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. A number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? True.
123 is not divisible by 2 it is divisible by 3
2345 + 13456 + 25099 = 40900
2345 + 13456 + 25099 = 40900
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
40900 Just add all 3 together.
As the World Turns - 1956 1-13456 was released on: USA: 13 February 2009
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
13456
0.0001
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 29, 58, 116, 232, 464, 841, 1682, 3364, 6728, 13456.
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?
NO. 313 is not divisible by 3.A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.313 = 3 + 1 + 3 = 7Note: 7 not divisible by 3 thus, 313 is not divisible by 3.