Two numbers which are "relatively prime" have no common prime factors. To illustrate, let's write several numbers in terms of their prime factors: 24 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 25 = 5 x 5 42 = 2 x 3 x 7 70 = 2 x 5 x 7 You can see that 24 and 25 are relatively prime, because they don't share any common prime factors. Likewise, 25 and 42 are relatively prime. 24 and 42, however, are NOT relatively prime because they share the common factors of 2 and 3. Likewise 25 and 70 are NOT relatively prime because they share the common factor 5. When a fraction is in its simplest form, the numerator and denominator are relatively prime.
22 is not relatively prime
Oh, what a happy little question we have here! 25 and 36 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 1, making them not coprime. But don't worry, every number is special in its own way, just like every brushstroke on a canvas adds to the beauty of a painting.
yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, 62 and 121 are relatively prime
25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
It can be. 16 is relatively prime with 25.
Relatively prime, yes.
25 and 98 are not prime numbers
26
No.
No.
Yes, they are. 5 is the only prime factor of 25 and 5 is not a factor of 18, so they have no prime factors in common, which is what relatively prime means.
Yes, e.g. 3 and 5 are relatively prime, 27 (33) and 25 (52) are relatively prime...
25 and 36 are relatively prime because they both share 1 as a factor, but no other factor. As their only common factor is 1, they are relatively prime. Neither is a prime number itself, but it is about the common factors, so in relation to each other, they are relatively prime.
Yes.