No because it will have a remainder
1, 17, 43, 731.
Nope - since the sum of the digits don't divide by three.
No, its not able to divide equally
855 and 875 are both evenly divisible by 5. 855 is evenly divisible by 3, but 875 isn't.
No because it will have a remainder
1, 17, 43, 731.
No
Nope - since the sum of the digits don't divide by three.
No because there will be a remainder
No. 717 is not evenly divisible by nine.
no
Well, let's take a moment to look at this question. To see if a number is divisible by 3, you can add up the digits and see if that sum is divisible by 3. For 780, 7 + 8 + 0 = 15, which is divisible by 3. But for 320, 3 + 2 + 0 = 5, which is not divisible by 3. So, 780 is divisible by 3. Now, to check if a number is divisible by 5, you can see if the last digit is 0 or 5. In this case, 780 ends in 0, so it's divisible by 5. However, 320 does not end in 0 or 5, so it's not divisible by 5. So, 780 is divisible by both 3 and 5, while 320 is only divisible by 5.
No.371/3 = 123 2/3 (one hundred and twenty three and two thirds).
No, it is not divisible by 3 Alternative answer Yes it is divisible by 3 but not to a whole number 705,220 divided by 3 = 235073.333333r e.g. three people won £705.220 on the lottery, if they divided the money equally they would each get £235,073.33
No, its not able to divide equally
Yes. answer is 236