Converse:If a number is divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is divisible by three. Inverse: If every digit of a number is not divisible by 3 then the number is not divisible by 3? Contrapositive:If a number is not divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is not divisible by three.
999 is divisible by 9, but not by six; the next lower number divisible by 9 is 990, which is also divisible by 6, so that's the answer. Some shortcuts for divisibility: 0 is divisible by any number. If the last digit of a number is divisible by 2, the number itself is divisible by 2. If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3, the number itself is divisible by 3. If the last TWO digits of a number are divisible by 4, the number itself is divisible by 4. If the last digit of a number is divisible by 5, the number itself is divisible by 5. If a number is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6. If the last THREE digits of a number are divisible by 8, the number itself is divisible by 8. If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 9, the number itself is divisible by 9. 990: 9+9+0=18, which is divisible by 9, so 990 is divisible by 9. 18 is also divisible by 3, so 990 is divisible by 3, and since 990 ends in 0 it's also divisible by 2, meaning that it's divisible by 6 as well.
35 is not divisible by 3.
There is no such number. Since 6 is divisible by 3, then any number that is divisible by 6 automatically has to be divisible by 3.
403 is divisible by no number
Yes, 758 divided by 2 = 379.
We don't know what a 'divisible' is. 4 goes into 758 189 times but then there's a couple left over. 758 doesn't go into 4 at all. So the answer is probably 'no' either way.
Yes, 3,790 is divisible by 1, 2, 5, 10, 379, 758, 1895, 3790.
758 = 758/1 in fraction
Converse:If a number is divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is divisible by three. Inverse: If every digit of a number is not divisible by 3 then the number is not divisible by 3? Contrapositive:If a number is not divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is not divisible by three.
999 is divisible by 9, but not by six; the next lower number divisible by 9 is 990, which is also divisible by 6, so that's the answer. Some shortcuts for divisibility: 0 is divisible by any number. If the last digit of a number is divisible by 2, the number itself is divisible by 2. If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3, the number itself is divisible by 3. If the last TWO digits of a number are divisible by 4, the number itself is divisible by 4. If the last digit of a number is divisible by 5, the number itself is divisible by 5. If a number is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6. If the last THREE digits of a number are divisible by 8, the number itself is divisible by 8. If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 9, the number itself is divisible by 9. 990: 9+9+0=18, which is divisible by 9, so 990 is divisible by 9. 18 is also divisible by 3, so 990 is divisible by 3, and since 990 ends in 0 it's also divisible by 2, meaning that it's divisible by 6 as well.
No. It is divisible by 11.No. It is divisible by 11.No. It is divisible by 11.No. It is divisible by 11.
A number is divisible by 4 if the last two digits are divisible by 4.A number is divisible by 4 if the last two digits are divisible by 4.A number is divisible by 4 if the last two digits are divisible by 4.A number is divisible by 4 if the last two digits are divisible by 4.
It is divisible by 6
35 is not divisible by 3.
There is no such number. Since 6 is divisible by 3, then any number that is divisible by 6 automatically has to be divisible by 3.
403 is divisible by no number