yes a multiple is the answer of the number multiplied by a whole number
No, not when negative numbers are involved. For example, -2 is a multiple of both -1 and 1 and is not greater than either.
Not necessarily. A number is also a multiple of itself.
A multiple of a natural number should be another natural number.
808
no
If it's a whole-number "multiple" and the number itself is positive,then the multiple is always greater than the number itself.
Not with negative numbers. -10 is a multiple of -2.
No, a multiple is not always greater than the original number. A multiple of a number is obtained by multiplying that number by an integer. For example, the first multiple of any positive number is the number itself, and for zero, all multiples are zero. In the case of negative numbers, multiples can also be less than the original number.
negative Example would be. 0.1x0.1=0.01
There is no greatest multiple of any number: whatever multiple of 4 you say is the greatest I can always add 4 and get an even greater multiple.
No, not when negative numbers are involved. For example, -2 is a multiple of both -1 and 1 and is not greater than either.
There is NO greatest common multiple because I can always add another lowest common multiple and get an ever greater number that is a common multiple.
No. Whatever multiple of the number you think might be the limit, you can always add the whole number again and have a larger multiple.
No, it is a factor. Multiples are always greater than the number itself, factors are smaller.
33 is the first composite number that is greater than 30 but is not a multiple of 2
Not necessarily. A number is also a multiple of itself.
9, a divisor of 18, is greater than 4, a multiple of 2.