No. 8 is a multiple of four (four times two) but 8 is smaller than 16, so there is no whole number to multiply with sixteen that gives us 8.
It does work the other way around, though. Every multiple of 16 is also a multiple of 4.
4, 8, 12, 16
4
a common multiple. eg. 4 is a common multiple of 12 and 16.
A number that ends in 3 can't be a multiple of 4 because the 4 times table goes in a pattern, (e.g 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24.) If the number ends in either 0 2 4 6 8 then it couldbe a possible multiple of 4. It always ends in an even number. 3 is not an even number so it is not going to be the last number of a multiple of 4.
1, 2 and 4
Yes, 16 is a multiple of 4.
16 is a multiple of 4 because 4x4=16
16 is a multiple of 1 because 1 x 16 = 16 16 is a multiple of 4 because 4 x 4 = 16 16 is a multiple of 16 because 16 x 1 = 16 16 is the LCM of that set of three numbers because there is no smaller number that is a multiple of those three.
The least common multiple (lowest common multiple) is 16.It is 4 x 4 and 16 x 1.Where one number is a whole-number multiple of the other, it is the LCM.Since 16 is a multiple of 4, it is automatically the LCM.
Yes. It's also a multiple of 1, 2, 16, and 32.
The least common multiple of 4 and 16 is 16It is: 16
16, 32, 48. Since 16 is divisible by 4. Every multiple of 16 is also a multiple of 4, so I just took the first 3 multiples of 16.
16 is a multiple of 1 because 1 x 16 = 16 16 is a multiple of 4 because 4 x 4 = 16 16 is a multiple of 16 because 16 x 1 = 16 16 is the LCM of that set of three numbers because there is no smaller number that is a multiple of those three.
The least common multiple of 4, 8, and 16 is 16.
16:16.....4:4,8,12,16....So the LCM of 16 and 4 is 16. This is a very simple question. All you do is find the least common multiple of 16, and i stopped at 16 because i know that 4 is also going to have a 16. So then i found the least common multiple of 4.The only thing that was possible was to put 16.Since 16 is a multiple of 4, it is automatically the LCM.
Since 16 is a multiple of 4, it is automatically the LCM.
No, but vice versa holds true. Case and point: 6 is a multiple of 2, but not a multiple of 4. 8 is a multiple of 4, and is a multiple of 2. Because a factor of 4 is 2, every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2. But since 4 is not a factor of 2, rather, only half of it, only half of the multiples of 2 will be multiples of 4.