This statement is not always true. While it is true that if a number is divisible by 4, it is also divisible by 2, the reverse is not necessarily true. For example, the number 6 is divisible by 2 but not by 4. In general, being divisible by 2 is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for being divisible by 4.
Yes, half of the numbers divisible by 2 are not divisible by 4. For example, 2 is divisible by 2 but not by 4. The same is true for 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, etc.
If this is a T-F question, the answer is false. It is true that if a number is divisible by 6, it also divisible by 3. This is true because 6 is divisible by 3. However, the converse -- If a number is divisible by 3, it is divisible by 6, is false. A counterexample is 15. 15 is divisible by 3, but not by 6. It becomes clearer if you split the question into its two parts. A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. A number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? True.
False. If it doesn't end with a 2, 4, 6, 8, or 0, then it's not divisible by 2.
Yes. They are all divisible by '2'
yes
Yes
The solution for 5 x 2 x 7 - 45678 is -45608.
True. Since 6 is divisible by 2, any number that is divisible by 6 will automatically be divisible by 2.
1233330-45678 = 1187652
45678-5487864 = -5442186
Yes because it is an even number
543.7857
the answer is no...............................
This statement is not always true. While it is true that if a number is divisible by 4, it is also divisible by 2, the reverse is not necessarily true. For example, the number 6 is divisible by 2 but not by 4. In general, being divisible by 2 is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for being divisible by 4.
Yes, that is true.
It is a statement which is true for some sums.