No. An irrational number is any number that is not a rational number; A rational number is any number that can be expressed as one integer over another integer. negative 3 over 4 is one integer (negative 3) over another integer (4), and so is a rational number.
It is rational
100/3 is a rational number
Rational (-1.5) Since it can be expressed as a fraction.
2/9 is rational by definition- it is a ratio of two integers.
It is rational and, therefore, real.
Neither. It is not defined.
it is irrational because you just keep writing the same number over and over again!
No. An irrational number is any number that is not a rational number; A rational number is any number that can be expressed as one integer over another integer. negative 3 over 4 is one integer (negative 3) over another integer (4), and so is a rational number.
Yes, it is.
rational
No. It is -3 and can be written as a fraction, so it is rational.
Statement 1 is true but totally unnecessary. As integer is always a rational and you do not need to convert it to a fraction to determine whether or not it is rational. A negative fraction is can be rational or irrational. The fact that it is negative is irrelevant to its rationality. An integer number over a zero denominator is not defined and so cannot be rational or irrational or anything. It just isn't.
It is rational
Rational.
It is rational
Rational -1.(3 repeating) Any repeating decimals are rational. However, a number such as pi (3.141592654...) does not repeat or end.