It's never been proven to be irrational, but I'm running it through an iterative precision program and so far I've got: 9.486832980505137995996680633298155601158665417975650480572514
It looks irrational up to its 60th decimal at least. Unfortunately, 60 is way less than infinity, so this really demonstrates nothing.
No.
No, the square root of 1000 is not rational.
The square root of 4 is 2. 2 is a rational number so they square root of 4 is rational.
It is rational. The root of a perfect square, such as 4, is rational; the root of any positive integer that is not a perfect square is an irrational number.
[ square root of (4.1) ] is irrational. But [ square root of (4) ] is rational.
No, it is not.
No.
No.
Oh, dude, the square root of 25 is 5, which is a whole number and can be expressed as a fraction 5/1. So, yes, it is a rational number because it can be written as a ratio of two integers. But hey, who really cares about all that math stuff anyway, right?
No, the square root of 1000 is not rational.
is the square root of 3 rational
The square root of 4 is 2. 2 is a rational number so they square root of 4 is rational.
The square root of 48 is a rational or irrational
No, the square root of 1500 is not a rational number.
It is rational. The root of a perfect square, such as 4, is rational; the root of any positive integer that is not a perfect square is an irrational number.
[ square root of (4.1) ] is irrational. But [ square root of (4) ] is rational.
Yes, it is the principal square root of 4, and it is rational.