No it is not an associative property.
Well, honey, the statement that division of a whole number is associative is as false as claiming you can wear a swimsuit in a blizzard. Just take the numbers 10, 5, and 2 for example. (10 ÷ 5) ÷ 2 is not the same as 10 ÷ (5 ÷ 2). So, there you have it - a sassy counterexample for you!
16x6 cannot have the associative property. The associative property requires two [identical] operations, applied to 3 variables. There are not enough operations nor variables/numbers in the question.
Associative property does not work with subtraction because not all numbers can be subtracted and have the same results............
I think it is the Associative Property.
No it is not an associative property.
No.
No
Yes.
Yes. Multiplication of integers, of rational numbers, of real numbers, and even of complex numbers, is both commutative and associative.
Yes. Multiplication of any real numbers has the associative property: (a x b) x c = a x (b x c)
It is a result of the associative property of numbers.It is a result of the associative property of numbers.It is a result of the associative property of numbers.It is a result of the associative property of numbers.
Well, honey, the statement that division of a whole number is associative is as false as claiming you can wear a swimsuit in a blizzard. Just take the numbers 10, 5, and 2 for example. (10 ÷ 5) ÷ 2 is not the same as 10 ÷ (5 ÷ 2). So, there you have it - a sassy counterexample for you!
To change the parentheses from two numbers to two numbers.
No, Associative proporties are not true for all integers. The deffinition for integer (n) 1. one of the positive or negative numbers 1, 2, 3, act., or zero. Compare whole number.
No.
No.