There is no name for it. If you were looking for the answer "capacity" the question is very poorly worded.
This is not well-worded. The smaller the cubes the more you'd need to fill a container, and the more completely they'd fill it. One large cube would not fill a round container but there might not be room for more than one.
yes, they fit easily together. This is called tessellation.
You would be adding volumes together; whatever configuration you put them would be irrelevant then. Assuming these are all 1" cubes, you would have first a long row of 8 (1"x1"x8" total) or a cube made of cubes (2"x2"x2" total) and they both come to 8 cubic inches.
Assuming all faces need to be painted, the question can be written as "how many faces on 43 cubes." There are 6 faces on each cube. Thus the answer can be got from the multiplication 43x6. Doing this gives us 258, so the number of faces that would need to be painted is 258.
It depends on how they are connected, i.e. how many are connected to each other. If they are connected in a line, with just one connection between any two cubes, the rectangle formed still has 6 faces, four of them rectangular (10 of the original 36 cubic faces are hidden between cubes, leaving 26 showing). If the maximum number of faces are connected, with 4 of the cubes as a larger cube and the other two attached together to it, there would be 3 large irregular faces (sides and back), 2 large cubic faces (bottom and front) and 3 rectangular faces (half cubes) as seen from the top. The total would be 8.
This is not well-worded. The smaller the cubes the more you'd need to fill a container, and the more completely they'd fill it. One large cube would not fill a round container but there might not be room for more than one.
Yes. If you have a square container and the volume is 27 inches. 3inches in length and 3 inches in height and 3 inches in width. Say have to fill it with 1 inch cubes. You would multiply 3x3x3 and get 27. That would be a good hypothesis.
white, for it absorbs the least amount of light.
This is a bogus/ an impossible question to answer mathematically, as firstly, you would need a data set of people with cubes in a hand, the size of the cubes is unknown, etc.
24 cubes would be it.
24 because if the width is 30 and the length is 40, 12 10 inch cubes would fit in each level. then the height is 20 so there would be two levels. 12 x 2 = 24
yes, they fit easily together. This is called tessellation.
There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.
This would be a gas. A gas expands to fill the space of the container that contains it.
The question cannot be answered sensibly. A cube cannot be cm2. cm2, if that is what was intended, is a measure of area, not of volume.
Ice cubes are not always true cubes to begin with but we call them that anyway. If you were to break one it would just be smaller pieces of ice which depending on your perception could still be called cubes.
In a container the volume remain constant but the pressure increase.