20 and 43
Hmmm. Let me see now ... "The smaller number is less than the larger number", eh ? I'm going to have to think that over carefully.
13 and 6
The two numbers are 9 and 23. 23-9 = 14 23-(2*9) = 5
Let the numbers be 'm' & 'n' m + n = 34 4m + 4 = n (4 times smaller is 4 less than the larger). Algebraically rearrange m + n = 34 4m - n = -4 Add 5m = 30 m = 6 Hence n = 28 (4 x 6 + 4 = 28). So the two numbers are 6 & 28 .
No. For example, 5 divided by 0.5 is equal to 10. In general, assuming you work with positive numbers only, if you divide by a number GREATER than one, the result will be less than the original number; if you divide by a number LESS than one, the result will be larger than the original number.
Hmmm. Let me see now ... "The smaller number is less than the larger number", eh ? I'm going to have to think that over carefully.
35 and 21
The numbers are 24 and 66.
101 and 26
12 and 26
10 and 49
Not always, if the smaller number is 0 or a negative number. Then their sum will be equal or less than the greater number.
Because the number of larger units will be less than the number of smaller units, and when you divide the answer is usually smaller than the number you started with.
It is the larger even number less the smaller one.
It depends on the whole number. The two numbers could be positive or negative which means that the product could be larger or smaller.
13 and 6
The two numbers are 9 and 23. 23-9 = 14 23-(2*9) = 5