None. Feet are a measure of length. Kilograms are a measure of mass
A giant squid is 50 feet long with the tentacles
Square feet are a measure of area (two dimensions) Linear feet are a measure of distance (one dimension) They don't translate.
In the US, square feet. In most other countries, I would presume, square meters.
you would measure it with feet
There are no feet in two hundred cubic feet. That's like asking how many inches are in a gallon. Feet are a measure of length or distance. Cubic feet are a measure of volume. You can't measure volume in feet. And you can't measure distance in cubic feet.
Square feet are a measure of area, feet are a measure of length. They are not comparable.
It is a measure of volume in the Imperial system, a measurement system which is now obsolete in all but a few recalcitrant countries.
It is a measure of volume in the Imperial system, a measurement system which is now obsolete in all but a few recalcitrant countries.
It is a measure of volume in the Imperial system, a measurement system which is now obsolete in all but a few recalcitrant countries.
None: I measure them in metres. But people did measure rooms, for example, in feet.
Feet can't be converted to square feet. Feet measure length, while square feet measure area.
No , feet is used to measure length.
Cubic feet is a measure of volume while square feet is a measure of area. They do not directly convert.
You don't convert square feet to feet. Square feet is the measure of an area. Feet is the measure of a length.
Feet is a measure of length, square feet is a measure of area. The two can not be equated.
Feet measure length, square feet measure area. Your question has no answer.