Those three preeminent powerhouses of the industrial world do:
- Liberia
- Myanmar
- the USA.
None. Feet are a measure of length. Kilograms are a measure of mass
A giant squid is 50 feet long with the tentacles
In the US, square feet. In most other countries, I would presume, square meters.
Square feet are a measure of area (two dimensions) Linear feet are a measure of distance (one dimension) They don't translate.
you would measure it with feet
There are no feet in two hundred cubic feet. That's like asking how many inches are in a gallon. Feet are a measure of length or distance. Cubic feet are a measure of volume. You can't measure volume in feet. And you can't measure distance in cubic feet.
Square feet are a measure of area, feet are a measure of length. They are not comparable.
It is a measure of volume in the Imperial system, a measurement system which is now obsolete in all but a few recalcitrant countries.
It is a measure of volume in the Imperial system, a measurement system which is now obsolete in all but a few recalcitrant countries.
It is a measure of volume in the Imperial system, a measurement system which is now obsolete in all but a few recalcitrant countries.
Feet can't be converted to square feet. Feet measure length, while square feet measure area.
None: I measure them in metres. But people did measure rooms, for example, in feet.
Cubic feet is a measure of volume while square feet is a measure of area. They do not directly convert.
No , feet is used to measure length.
You don't convert square feet to feet. Square feet is the measure of an area. Feet is the measure of a length.
You can't, cubic feet is a three dimensional measure, feet is a two dimensional measure.
Feet measure length, square feet measure area. Your question has no answer.