um that answer is incorrect. im a history teacher and it is calendars and dating systems.
A measure of time: in 25 minutes, the time will be 1 O'clock (am or pm).A measure of time: in 25 minutes, the time will be 1 O'clock (am or pm).A measure of time: in 25 minutes, the time will be 1 O'clock (am or pm).A measure of time: in 25 minutes, the time will be 1 O'clock (am or pm).
It depends on the context. A second can be a measure of time or of an angle.
9.72 seconds is a measure of time. I cannot be converted to a measure of speed.
Hours cannot be converted to km. Hours is a measure of time and km is a measure of distance.
You don't convert hours to km. Hours is a measure of time, km. is a measure of length.If you mean, how long would such a trip take, that would depend on the speed. Use the relationship: distance = speed x time. Solving for time: time = distance / speed. If distance is in km. and speed in km/hour, then the time will of course be in hours.You don't convert hours to km. Hours is a measure of time, km. is a measure of length.If you mean, how long would such a trip take, that would depend on the speed. Use the relationship: distance = speed x time. Solving for time: time = distance / speed. If distance is in km. and speed in km/hour, then the time will of course be in hours.You don't convert hours to km. Hours is a measure of time, km. is a measure of length.If you mean, how long would such a trip take, that would depend on the speed. Use the relationship: distance = speed x time. Solving for time: time = distance / speed. If distance is in km. and speed in km/hour, then the time will of course be in hours.You don't convert hours to km. Hours is a measure of time, km. is a measure of length.If you mean, how long would such a trip take, that would depend on the speed. Use the relationship: distance = speed x time. Solving for time: time = distance / speed. If distance is in km. and speed in km/hour, then the time will of course be in hours.
Compass
Historians need archaeologists to provide physical evidence to support their theories and interpretations about past societies. Anthropologists help historians understand the cultural context of historical events by studying human societies, behaviors, and beliefs. Together, archaeologists and anthropologists provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the past.
chicken
Different types of letters rely on different types of historians and therefore gives very useful historical information. They give various types of information based on different historians.
We rely on legends Because Historians Don't know exscatly What happen.
no you can't
Historians do not rely extensively on court chronicles because they tend to be biased in favor of the ruling power and may omit important details that do not align with the official narrative. Court chronicles also often lack a diversity of perspectives and can be more focused on glorifying the ruler rather than providing an accurate account of events.
Without a time perspective, history would be just a jumble of factoids. History is the story of the progress of mankind, and so dates, times, periods are an integral part of the story of progression and regression.
I can always rely on your candor! Let's rely on time, as it will always tell.
they eveyone they dont cheat its all bout us the surrenos hahaha
The answer isA. cultural anthropologists.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.