Use the range rule of thumb; range/4 or 36/4 = 9.
It means the same in math as it means else where--it means not reasonable. If you show mathematical steps that are not reasonable to solve a math problem or show a math proof, then your math is unreasonable.
It means to tell what the formula is
The empirical rule is 68 - 95 - 99.7. 68% is the area for +/- 1 standard deviation (SD) from the mean, 95% is the area for +/- 2 SD from the mean; and 99.7% is the area for +/- 3 SD from the mean.
a moderate estimate, not expensive, reasonable in price
The two main standards of foreseeability are subjective (based upon what the at-fault party actually knew or understood) and objective (measured by what a reasonable person would have known under similar or the same circumstances).
Unreasonable for something not to happen. With a high degree of foreseeability.
The two main standards of foreseeability are subjective (based upon what the at-fault party actually knew or understood) and objective (measured by what a reasonable person would have known under similar or the same circumstances).
The standard of a duty of reasonable care is determined based on what a hypothetical reasonable person would do in similar circumstances, taking into account factors such as the foreseeability of harm, the relationship between the parties, and the nature of the activity involved. Courts consider what actions would be considered reasonable and prudent under the specific circumstances of a case.
In law, foreseeable subjective is would be what someone literally saw or knew, and foreseeable objective would be what a reasonable person in that situation would have seen or knew about that situation.
Unreasonable for something not to happen. With a high degree of foreseeability.
The reasonable access rule required that stations make their facilities available for the expression of conflicting views on issues by all responsible elements in the community.
Foreseeability in negligence refers to whether a reasonable person could have foreseen that their actions (or lack of action) could cause harm to another person. In terms of causation, a plaintiff must show that the harm caused was a foreseeable result of the defendant's actions in order to establish the necessary link between the defendant's conduct and the harm suffered by the plaintiff. If the harm was not foreseeable, it may be difficult to prove that the defendant's actions were the proximate cause of the injury.
necessary expense rule
Necessary Expense Rule
The reasonable access rule required that stations make their facilities available for the expression of conflicting views on issues by all responsible elements in the community.
Foreseeability in the law of tort refers to the idea that a reasonable person could have anticipated the potential consequences of their actions. It is used to determine whether a defendant could have reasonably predicted that their actions would result in harm to another party. If harm was foreseeable, the defendant may be held liable for negligence.