0
What else can I help you with?
If the range of a set of data is 36 then a reasonable estimate of the standard deviation is?
Use the range rule of thumb; range/4 or 36/4 = 9.
What is unreasonable mean in math?
It means the same in math as it means else where--it means not reasonable. If you show mathematical steps that are not reasonable to solve a math problem or show a math proof, then your math is unreasonable.
What does tell the rule mean in math?
It means to tell what the formula is
What is the empirical rule for 1 and 2 standard deviations?
The empirical rule is 68 - 95 - 99.7. 68% is the area for +/- 1 standard deviation (SD) from the mean, 95% is the area for +/- 2 SD from the mean; and 99.7% is the area for +/- 3 SD from the mean.
What is a reasonable estimate?
a moderate estimate, not expensive, reasonable in price
How are the concept of the reasonable person and foreseeability related?
The concept of the reasonable person and foreseeability are closely related in the context of negligence law. A reasonable person standard establishes how an average individual would act in a similar situation, serving as a benchmark for determining whether someone’s actions were appropriate. Foreseeability pertains to whether a reasonable person could anticipate the potential consequences of their actions. Together, these concepts help assess liability by evaluating if the defendant's conduct was reasonable and if the harm was a foreseeable result of that conduct.
What is objective foreseeability?
The two main standards of foreseeability are subjective (based upon what the at-fault party actually knew or understood) and objective (measured by what a reasonable person would have known under similar or the same circumstances).
What does substantially certain mean?
Unreasonable for something not to happen. With a high degree of foreseeability.
What is foreseeability?
The two main standards of foreseeability are subjective (based upon what the at-fault party actually knew or understood) and objective (measured by what a reasonable person would have known under similar or the same circumstances).
How is the standard of a duty of reasonable care determined?
The standard of a duty of reasonable care is determined based on what a hypothetical reasonable person would do in similar circumstances, taking into account factors such as the foreseeability of harm, the relationship between the parties, and the nature of the activity involved. Courts consider what actions would be considered reasonable and prudent under the specific circumstances of a case.
What was the rule of law in the maddox v Montgomery?
In Maddox v. Montgomery, the rule of law established was that a party can be held liable for negligence if they fail to exercise reasonable care, leading to harm to another party. The court emphasized the importance of duty of care and the foreseeability of harm in determining liability. This case underscored the legal principle that individuals and entities must act with caution to prevent causing injury to others.
What is the difference between subjective and objective foreseeability?
In law, foreseeable subjective is would be what someone literally saw or knew, and foreseeable objective would be what a reasonable person in that situation would have seen or knew about that situation.
What does substantiated?
Unreasonable for something not to happen. With a high degree of foreseeability.
What is reasonable access rule?
The reasonable access rule required that stations make their facilities available for the expression of conflicting views on issues by all responsible elements in the community.
How does foreseeability apply to the element of causation in negligence?
Foreseeability in negligence refers to whether a reasonable person could have foreseen that their actions (or lack of action) could cause harm to another person. In terms of causation, a plaintiff must show that the harm caused was a foreseeable result of the defendant's actions in order to establish the necessary link between the defendant's conduct and the harm suffered by the plaintiff. If the harm was not foreseeable, it may be difficult to prove that the defendant's actions were the proximate cause of the injury.
What concept was developed by the GAO to apply reasonable discretion an flexibilty?
necessary expense rule
What concept was developed by the gao to apply reasonable discretion and flexibility?
Necessary Expense Rule
