Both Macbeth and his wife plotted this murder. The target was to be one of Macbeth's closest friends..... he had it setup so that while his friend and his friend's son were traveling to meet him they would be attacked and killed by robbers so that no blame could pass upon the now King Macbeth. The unfortunate son escaped with his life.... the father was not so lucky
It is 3 (three)
It is 0.2222 repeating, or 2/9
The ending digit of square number is either 0, 1,4,5,6 or 9 only.
For example: 8 + 8 = 16 If you know that equals 16 then 2 more would be 18.
Are you posting questions to which you already know the answers?Add the first two digits and get the third; add the second and third digits and get the fourth, add the third and fourth and get the fifth, etc. Next is 18.
The play doesn't say so, but it is a plausible interpretation. Macbeth wants to be safe; it wouldn't be safe having these cutthroats who know he was involved in Banquo's death hanging around.
Miss Havisham is a wealthy, eccentric woman who is jilted at the altar and becomes bitter and reclusive. Lady Macbeth, on the other hand, is ambitious and manipulative, urging her husband to commit murder to fulfill her own ambitions. Miss Havisham is a tragic figure consumed by her past, while Lady Macbeth is a ruthless and ambitious character driven by power.
Yes
Nobody. He was the King, not a kitchen wench. A place was laid at the table for Banquo, but of course it was. Do you think Macbeth could go to the kitchen staff and say, "Uh, don't bother setting a place for Banquo since he's going to be dead by suppertime. Not that I know anything about it. How could I unless I was the murderer? Uh, you didn't hear that last bit."
Well there is a theory that actually Macbeth was there when Banquo was killed, and Macbeth was actually the third murderer. (Kind of unlikely since the other two murderers know Macbeth and would have recognized him) Also if you don't accept this theory, Macbeth might have not killed Banquo with his own hands because by that time he was already king, and he had the finance and the oppurtunity to hire murderers. As Macbeth himself says in Act 3 scene one from line 125, he does have the power to openly have Banquo destroyed, "yet I must not, for certain friends that are both his and mine, whose loves I may not drop, but wail his fall who I myself strike down." Yet this is just an excuse, a lie because Macbeth knows that there is no good reason for Banquo and Fleance to be killed and so he could not have him openly accused of anything. Macbeth knows that Banquo and Fleance are innocent. He orders their murder out of fear that the throne will be taken away from him and that Banquo's decendants will inherit it.
No I Dont(:
The first murderer is reminding Macbeth that they are both men, implying that they should act like men by carrying out the deed they have been assigned without hesitation or fear. This statement could also be seen as a way to challenge Macbeth's courage and masculinity, pushing him to commit to their mutually agreed-upon plan.
Lady Macbeth in Shakespeare's play Macbeth says, 'You know your own degrees'
In the play "Macbeth," Lady Macduff and her children are murdered by Macbeth's henchmen on Macbeth's orders. The murder is part of Macbeth's plan to secure his position as king by eliminating potential threats to his power.
Lady Macbeth rang the bell three times to give Macbeth a signal that Duncan's servant are asleep and the time is right for Macbeth to enter Duncan's chamber
No, Macbeth was already Thane of Glamis.Quote from original Mabeth scene 3."FIRST WITCH.All hail, Macbeth! hail to thee, Thane of Glamis!SECOND WITCH.All hail, Macbeth! hail to thee, Thane of Cawdor!THIRD WITCH.All hail, Macbeth! that shalt be king hereafter!""MACBETH.Stay, you imperfect speakers, tell me more:By Sinel's death I know I am Thane of Glamis;But how of Cawdor? The Thane of Cawdor lives...":)
If he did, it is not shown in the play. As far as we know, he only had the one chance encounter with them.