351 is not divisible by 2. 2 is not divisible by 351.
Of course not ! The answer is right within your question: 2 is divisible by 2 but 2 is not divisible by ... (can you dig it ?)
123 is not divisible by 2 it is divisible by 3
If the number formed by the last three digits is divisible by 8. Alternatively, if the number is divisible by 2, the quotient is divisible by 2 and that quotient is divisible by 2.
No. But 2,360 is divisible by 2 .
58,930 is divisible by these factors: 1, 2, 5, 10, 71, 83, 142, 166, 355, 415, 710, 830, 5893, 11786, 29465, 58930.
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
351 is not divisible by 2. 2 is not divisible by 351.
2 is not divisible by 19008. 19008 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 972. 972 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 870. 870 is divisible by 2.
Of course not ! The answer is right within your question: 2 is divisible by 2 but 2 is not divisible by ... (can you dig it ?)
no.. for example 6,12,18 are divisible by 2..but not divisible by 8.
123 is not divisible by 2 it is divisible by 3
416 is divisible by 2 but is not divisible by 3.
402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 342. 342 is divisible by 2.