It seems that somebody told you that every fraction could be written as a whole number.
That person knew not whereof he spoke.
The smallest whole number is ' 1 '. "7 over 10" is 30 percent less than ' 1 '.
It doesn't have what it takes to be any whole number.
If every fraction could be written as a whole number, then nobody would need fractions.
If that's the mixed number 7 and 1/3, the whole number is 7.
3 over 7 is a fraction and is not equivalent to a whole number.
No because 7/9 is a fraction which is not a whole number
7/12 cant be a mixed number because it is less than a whole and a mixed number is at least a whole or higher.
Well, darling, 7 over 1 is just 7. It's like asking how many slices of cheesecake you want - you want the whole darn thing, not just a piece. So, in this case, the whole number of 7 over 1 is simply 7.
The reciprocal of 27/10 is 10/27
7 over 4 does not equate to a whole number.
33 over 7 does not equate to a whole number.
1/7 is a fraction and not a whole number. So it cannot be expressed as a whole number.
Since 52 is not divisible by 7, 52 over 7 is a mixed fraction. It cannot be written as a whole number for the simple reason that it is not a whole number.
If that's the mixed number 7 and 1/3, the whole number is 7.
3 over 7 is a fraction and is not equivalent to a whole number.
yes It depends upon the context. If "3 over 7" is intended to be a fraction, then it is not a whole number.
I have no clue
No because 7/9 is a fraction which is not a whole number
The integer part of 7.3 is 7, as it is the whole number portion of the decimal. When considering it as a whole number, 7.3 can be rounded to 7 if you are looking for the nearest integer. Thus, 7.3 as an integer over a whole number is simply 7.
Take the number you have out of the whole, then dived it by the whole number. Multiply the resulting number by 100 and that's your percent.Example:What percentage is 7 of 10?7 / 10= .7.7 x 100 = 707 is 70% of 10.