Such as pi? That would be an irrational number.
Buy a calculator with a square root button? Approximately 6.08276. Since the square root of 37 is an irrational number, its decimal representation neither terminates nor repeats. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrational_number.
300 ml is a measure of volume. A decimal is a number - pure and simple - neither mass, nor volume, neither length not time. So there is no decimal that is the same as 300 ml.
No. An irrational number is a number that neither terminates nor repeats. Since 1 terminates, it is called a rationalnumber.No. An irrational number is a number that is not rational. Rational numbers are those who can be defined as the division of two integer numbers. As 1 is 1/1, it is a rational number, so, it's not irrational.
0 and 1 are neither prime nor composite.
Such as pi? That would be an irrational number.
Neither 1/3 nor 1/9 terminates as a decimal.
No. A rational number is a number that either terminates or repeats. An irrational number neither terminates nor repeats. Therefore, it cannot be both.
Buy a calculator with a square root button? Approximately 6.08276. Since the square root of 37 is an irrational number, its decimal representation neither terminates nor repeats. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrational_number.
300 ml is a measure of volume. A decimal is a number - pure and simple - neither mass, nor volume, neither length not time. So there is no decimal that is the same as 300 ml.
Every rational number has a decimal expansion that either terminates (like 42.23517) or repeats (like 26.1447676767676...)Pi's decimal expansion neither terminates nor repeatsHence, Pi cannot be rational.If we could prove the first two statements, this would constitute a proof that Pi is irrational, but most people cannot provide proof of either. Most proofs on this issue are quite technical, but I'm hoping to return to this question with a suitable answer soon.
Salt and water do not form a compound of any kind - neither decimal nor chemical.
If the decimal of a fraction either terminates or ends with a repeating cycle of digit(s) then it is a rational number; otherwise it does not terminate nor does it have a repeating cycle of digit(s) at the end and is irrational. 0.12345 terminates as so it rational If that was repeating, as in 0.123451234512345..., then it is still rational.
Neither, then nor; eg neither Jack nor John can ski.
Yes. Any number that can be expressed as a finite or repeating decimal is a rational number. Irrational numbers have decimal expansions that neither repeat nor terminate.
"Nor" typically pairs with "neither" to form a correlative conjunction. For example, "She wanted neither the red dress nor the blue dress."
Decimals that terminate or repeat in some fashion are rational, while decimals that expand forever are irrational.