yes and no because if it zero wouldn't it be a whole number or a improper fraction with a 1 under the numerator
It is not defined.
Not allowed! The operation "divide by zero" is not defined. However, in the limit, as the denominator of a fraction approches zero, the quotient approached infinity. In other words, the result gets larger and larger the closer the denominator gets to zero. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Another thing to consider is the recipical of Y=2/X. YX=2 is an equivative of Y=X\2. But you know that any number multiplied by 0 is 0. If X is 0 in the equation the two variables could not equal 2.
When the numerator is equal to the denominator it equals 1 if the numerator is greater than the denominator then you could change it to a mixed number like 3/2 equals 1 1/2
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, the ratio 2 to 5 is not equal to the ratio 5 to 2. It's like saying you have 2 pizzas for every 5 friends, which is not the same as saying you have 5 pizzas for every 2 friends. See what I mean? It's all about the order, man.
It is a rational fraction.
yes and no because if it zero wouldn't it be a whole number or a improper fraction with a 1 under the numerator
The ratio of two integers is a fraction that represents the division of one integer by another. As long as the denominator is not equal to zero, the ratio is defined. For example, the ratio of 4 to 2 is 4/2, which simplifies to 2.
A ratio with denominator 0 is not defined.
Zero.
No.Natural numbers by definition are whole: integers. However, if the numerator cannot be divided evenly by the denominator, or even if the numerator is less than the denominator, then it is impossible for such a ratio to result in an integer. Such ratios cannot simplify into natural numbers. (Note: This assumes that 0 is not a natural number--there is a disagreement over its membership. If 0 is considered a natural number, than any ratio with a 0 in the numerator but anything else in the denominator results in 0. A ratio with a nonzero numerator and a zero denominator is undefined. A 0/0 ratio is considered an indeterminate form and goes into calculus).
zero is rational because it can be written as a fraction where the denominator is not equal to 0. it can be written as 0/1, 0/2, 0/3, etc
It is not defined.
It is not defined.
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, the ratio 2 to 5 is not equal to the ratio 5 to 2. It's like saying you have 2 pizzas for every 5 friends, which is not the same as saying you have 5 pizzas for every 2 friends. See what I mean? It's all about the order, man.
2,/14, 3/21, 4/28, ... Simply mutliply both the numerator and denominator by the same number, and you get whatever equal fraction you want.
2 fifths (not fiths!) = 2/5.Multiply the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom) of the fraction by any non-zero integer. You will have an equivalent fraction.2 fifths (not fiths!) = 2/5.Multiply the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom) of the fraction by any non-zero integer. You will have an equivalent fraction.2 fifths (not fiths!) = 2/5.Multiply the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom) of the fraction by any non-zero integer. You will have an equivalent fraction.2 fifths (not fiths!) = 2/5.Multiply the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom) of the fraction by any non-zero integer. You will have an equivalent fraction.