It is not possible to answer the question.
The fact that there are four lengths given in the question suggests that the shape is a quadrilateral. Unfortunately, the lengths of a quadrilateral's sides does not determine its area. One way to see this is that a square can be flexed into a rhombus and the top and bottom sides of the rhombus brought closer and closer together until its area is almost zero.
It is not possible to answer the question.
The fact that there are four lengths given in the question suggests that the shape is a quadrilateral. Unfortunately, the lengths of a quadrilateral's sides does not determine its area. One way to see this is that a square can be flexed into a rhombus and the top and bottom sides of the rhombus brought closer and closer together until its area is almost zero.
It is not possible to answer the question.
The fact that there are four lengths given in the question suggests that the shape is a quadrilateral. Unfortunately, the lengths of a quadrilateral's sides does not determine its area. One way to see this is that a square can be flexed into a rhombus and the top and bottom sides of the rhombus brought closer and closer together until its area is almost zero.
It is not possible to answer the question.
The fact that there are four lengths given in the question suggests that the shape is a quadrilateral. Unfortunately, the lengths of a quadrilateral's sides does not determine its area. One way to see this is that a square can be flexed into a rhombus and the top and bottom sides of the rhombus brought closer and closer together until its area is almost zero.
It is not possible to answer the question.
The fact that there are four lengths given in the question suggests that the shape is a quadrilateral. Unfortunately, the lengths of a quadrilateral's sides does not determine its area. One way to see this is that a square can be flexed into a rhombus and the top and bottom sides of the rhombus brought closer and closer together until its area is almost zero.
um i think you multiply them
-15m but -15 metres doesnt exist
5m+3=3m+9 5m+3-3=3m+9-3 5m=3m+6 5m-3m=3m+6-3m 2m=6 (2m)/2=6/2 m=3
-3m = 5m+8 -3m-5m = 8 -8m = 8 m = -1
4m+9+5m-12=42 9m=45 m=5
um i think you multiply them
5m,4m,3m respectively
5*4*3 60?
-15m but -15 metres doesnt exist
The area of rectangle is : 20.0
-7m - 3m + 5m = -5m
5m+3=3m+9 5m+3-3=3m+9-3 5m=3m+6 5m-3m=3m+6-3m 2m=6 (2m)/2=6/2 m=3
Every one of them could be a side of a rectangle. It is not possible to give an answer in respect of an unspecified rectangular object. however, i feel the question is incorrect as it should be sides of the triangle and according to it 3rd is the answer as 3+5<9 :)
-3m = 5m+8 -3m-5m = 8 -8m = 8 m = -1
The area is 15 square metres.
Force = 450N Area Of Contact = 5m * 4m = 20m2 Pressure = Thrust /Area = 450/20 N/m2 = 22.5 PA = 22.5 N/m2
Rectangles are really simple. The perimeter is twice the length plus twice the width (in this case 4m x 2 = 8m, 5m x 2 = 10m, and 8m + 10m = 18m). The area is simply the length times the width (in this case, 4m x 5m = 20m2).