Why do you need to ESTIMATE? The exact answer is easy enough to determine! It is 94.
Chat with our AI personalities
Divide the sum of the three consecutive odd integers by 3: -273 /3 = -91. The smallest of these integers will be two less than -91 and the largest will be two more than -91, so the three consecutive odd integers will be -89, -91, and -93.
Sum of divisors = 91.
it would be a common sum of 91+8 2+7 3+6 4+5
45 + 46 = 91.Suck on it, trebek!
A reasonable estimate of the sum of 78 and 119 is 197.
3
3 + 88 = 91
3 + 5 + 83
It is 61: you do not need to estimate a sum as simple as that!
The estimate would be 9.3333 or 91/3
Divide the sum of the three consecutive odd integers by 3: -273 /3 = -91. The smallest of these integers will be two less than -91 and the largest will be two more than -91, so the three consecutive odd integers will be -89, -91, and -93.
The answer is -30.
Sum of divisors = 91.
No, 91 is Not a multiple of 3.An easy way to determine if a number is a multiple or divisible by 3 is to add up all itsdigits and see if the sum is divisible by three.For example: 321 , 3 + 2 + 1, Therefore 321 is divisible by 3 or a multiple of 3.Unlike the number 131, 1 + 3 + 1, whose digits sum up to 5, which isn't divisible by 3.So therefore, 91 is 9+1 Therefore 91 is not a multiple of 3.Hope we helped!
87,89,91.....87+89+91=267
The two different perfect cubes whose sum is closest to 99 without exceeding 99 are 64 and 27 (4^3 and 3^3). Their sum is 91.
it would be a common sum of 91+8 2+7 3+6 4+5