The main difference between Kepler's system and Copernicus' system lies in their approach to planetary motion. Copernicus proposed a heliocentric model, where the Sun is at the center of the solar system, while Kepler's model focused on the elliptical orbits of planets around the Sun. Copernicus' system laid the groundwork for a sun-centered model, while Kepler's laws of planetary motion provided a more accurate description of the paths planets take as they orbit the Sun.
Chat with our AI personalities
Copernicus's theory has the Sun at the centre but uses a model of circles and epicycles in the same way that the ancient Ptolemaic one used.
Kepler continued to use the idea of having the Sun at the centre but, with the help of Tycho Brahe's new accurate observations, Kepler discovered that elliptical orbits allowed a better fit to the observed positions.
Tycho instructed Kepler to work on the orbit of Mars, which was a real piece of luck because Mars's orbit is more elliptical than the other planets' orbits (except Mercury). This led Kepler to the idea of the ellipse, which is the model used today.
Copernicus's system used circles and epicycles, just like the ancient Ptolemaic system, with the difference that by placing the Sun at the centre Copernicus could simplify the complicated paths taken by the planets through space. Kepler had the advantage of new accurate observations made by Tycho Brahe at the end of the 16th century, and these enabled Kepler to realise that by using elliptical orbits for the planets, the modelled positions could be fitted more closely with the measured positions. Kepler retained the idea of having the Sun at the centre and it is the model used today with slight modifications from Einstein's theory of relativity.
there is a huge difference. :)
From about 1510-1514 Copernicus developed his first general outline of his new heliocentric system.
the sun is the center of the solar system.
he founded the solar system