I only know 3. SSS (side/side/side) -> if all three sides are the same length SAS (side/angle/side) -> if two sides and the angle between them are the same ASA (angle/side/angle) -> if two angles and the side between them are the same
they are all postulates or shortcuts on finding 2 triangles congruence, except that SAA does not exist.
SAS postulate or SSS postulate.
SAS and SSS are congruent. SSA need not be.
SSS-side, side, side SAS-side, angle, side ASA-angle, side, angle SAA-side, angle, angle
the congruence theorems or postulates are: SAS AAS SSS ASA
Asa /sss
if you can prove using sss,asa,sas,aas
The SSS, ASA and SAA postulates together signify what conditions must be present for two triangles to be congruent. Do all of the conditions this postulates represent together have to be present for two triangles to be congruent ? Explain.
I only know 3. SSS (side/side/side) -> if all three sides are the same length SAS (side/angle/side) -> if two sides and the angle between them are the same ASA (angle/side/angle) -> if two angles and the side between them are the same
SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS, RHS. SSA can prove congruence if the angle in question is obtuse (if it's 90 degrees, then it's exactly equivalent to RHS).
there are 4 types of congruence theorem-: ASA,SSS,RHS,SAS
All three of those CAN .
trueTrue -- SSA does NOT guarantee congruence.Only SAS, SSS, and ASA can do that (and AAS, because if two pairs of corresponding angles are congruent, the third has to be).
SSS- side side side SAS- side angle side ASA- angle side angle There is also: AAS- angle angle side For right triangles: HL- hypotenuse leg
The correct answer is the AAS theorem
they are all postulates or shortcuts on finding 2 triangles congruence, except that SAA does not exist.