The program recommends a constant intensity for 3 visits, increasing intensity over 3 visits, and then decreasing intensity for 3 visits before restarting the pattern. Which sets of values could be the intensities of Amber's exercise during the fourth, fifth, and sixth visits? Check all that apply.
43.289 in.
In engineering, the precision of a quantity is implicitly told in the number of digits presented. In the number 254.34, the precision is of six digits. If by one hundredth it is meant 1/100 of the unit then the number in question is already given to the nearest hundredth. No more rounding is necessary. If the rounding is going to be down to the nearest hundred, then the number is written as 3 x 10^2. This means the quantity has dropped down to a one order magnitude level. Precision of the number is just of one digit. RafaelRZ :The answer provided by' Ericbames' is correct.
They tell you what level of precision you can expect from measurements that are made using that instrument.
Not enough information has been provided to give a precise answer.
The square root of 66 is irrational. There is, therefore, no "best" approximation since that depends on what level of precision you require. In some cases 8.1 is sufficient, in other situations you may want 8.12404 and in some you may want even more precision.The square root of 66 is irrational. There is, therefore, no "best" approximation since that depends on what level of precision you require. In some cases 8.1 is sufficient, in other situations you may want 8.12404 and in some you may want even more precision.The square root of 66 is irrational. There is, therefore, no "best" approximation since that depends on what level of precision you require. In some cases 8.1 is sufficient, in other situations you may want 8.12404 and in some you may want even more precision.The square root of 66 is irrational. There is, therefore, no "best" approximation since that depends on what level of precision you require. In some cases 8.1 is sufficient, in other situations you may want 8.12404 and in some you may want even more precision.
43.289 in.
when level of significant is constant and df is increases why table value decrease.
12.5 and 1,365.7 *APEX* 1.1&&100.6 0.59&&98.42 Correct answer: 35.68 and 0.764
No. It isnt.
4+(3/1000)=4.00300 * * * * * Not quite! The trailing 0s imply a much greater degree of precision than given. Whatis given above is 4 and 300 over 100000. The appropriate level of accuracy is given by 4.003
100.6 and 1.1
In engineering, the precision of a quantity is implicitly told in the number of digits presented. In the number 254.34, the precision is of six digits. If by one hundredth it is meant 1/100 of the unit then the number in question is already given to the nearest hundredth. No more rounding is necessary. If the rounding is going to be down to the nearest hundred, then the number is written as 3 x 10^2. This means the quantity has dropped down to a one order magnitude level. Precision of the number is just of one digit. RafaelRZ :The answer provided by' Ericbames' is correct.
It is still 36. Someone might say 36.00, but adding the extra two zeros is not justified, because the number was not given to that level of precision in the first place.
The length of time a star burns depends on its temperature and mass. It's certainly not possible to calculate this to the level of precision of seconds, and it's difficult to do so to the level of precision of millennia.
The isobars are generated from mean sea level pressure reports and the pressure values are given in millibars.
Accuracy is hitting the same, correct point, sort of like hitting the bulls eye of a target. Precision is less stringent, as long as your data points are clustered together (it's also known as the level of uncertainty or variance), it is deemed precise. Scientifically speaking, experiments have to be both accurate and precise.
The discovery of argon was not recorded to that level of precision.