This appears to be two interwoven sequences. The first sequence, increases by 9 then 19......7 + 9 = 16........8 + 19 = 27 The second sequence decreases by 8 then 18....16 - 8 = 8........27 - 9 = 18 The next number would thus be 9 + 29 = 38.
The pattern in the given sequence is as follows: 67 (6+7=13) 8 29 (2+9=11) 16 55 (5+5=10) 8 313 (3+1+3=7) 16 43 (4+3=7) 8 Therefore, the number that should replace the question mark is 43 (4+3=7) 8.
29
42 is the next number in this sequence. This number sequence is adding the next prime number to the last number. So 1 + 2 = 3. Then 3 + 3 = 6, 6 + 5 = 11, 11 + 7 = 18, 18 + 11 = 29. The next prime number after 11 is 13, so 29 + 13 = 42. The next numbers would be 59 (42+17), 78 (59+19), and 101 (78+23)
Prime factorization of each number is as follows: 29=29 (it's prime) 58=2*29 4=2^2 The LCM is 2^2*29 = 116.
16 21 22 29
This appears to be two interwoven sequences. The first sequence, increases by 9 then 19......7 + 9 = 16........8 + 19 = 27 The second sequence decreases by 8 then 18....16 - 8 = 8........27 - 9 = 18 The next number would thus be 9 + 29 = 38.
The pattern in the given sequence is as follows: 67 (6+7=13) 8 29 (2+9=11) 16 55 (5+5=10) 8 313 (3+1+3=7) 16 43 (4+3=7) 8 Therefore, the number that should replace the question mark is 43 (4+3=7) 8.
39
29 over 16 written as a mixed number is: 113/16
The missing number is 26. The number after 29 is 58.
16
127.
29
29
Un = 29 - 9n
The number that doesn't belong in the sequence is 29. This is because all the other numbers are either multiples of 2 or can be obtained by adding 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 to the previous number. In contrast, 29 does not follow this pattern and disrupts the sequence.