0
What else can I help you with?
What number has 9 ten thousands the same number of thousands as ten thousands 8 fewer hundreds than ten thousands 6 more tens than hundreds and 6 fewer ones than thousands?
Having: 9 ten-thousands → 90,000 the same number of thousands as ten thousands → 9 ten-thousands: 9 thousands → 9,000 8 fewer hundreds than ten-thousands → 9 ten-thousand: 9 - 8 = 1 hundreds → 100 6 more tens than hundreds → 1 hundreds: 1 + 6 = 7 tens → 70 6 fewer ones than thousands → 9 thousands: 9 - 6 = 3 ones → 3 → the number is 90,000 + 9,000 + 100 + 70 + 3 = 99,173.
What number has 2 thousands 2 more hundreds than thousands 7 more tens than thousands and 5 more ones than hundreds?
The smallest such number is 2499.
What number has 7 thousands 5 fewer hundreds than thousands 3 more tens than hundreds and 5 fewer ones than thousands?
7252
How many times more is hundreds thousands than ten thousands?
One hundred thousand is ten times greater than ten thousand. 10 000 x 10 = 100 000
How do you solve What number has 1 thousand 8 more hundreds than thousands 1 fewer ten than hundreds and 2 fewer ones than tens?
The number has 1 thousand. It has 8 more hundreds than thousands so it has 8 more hundreds than 1. That is, it has 9 hundreds. It has 1 fewer tens than hundreds so it has 1 fewer tens than 9. That is, it has 8 tens.It has 2 fewer ones than tens so it has 2 fewer ones than 8. That is, it has 6 ones. So the number is 1986.
What number has 4 thousands, 2 more hundreds than thousands, 1 fewer ten than hundreds, and 1 more one than thousands?
Four thousand 2 and one thousand 2 then 10000 thousand
What number has 2 thousands the same number of hundreds as thousands 1 more ten than hundreds and no ones?
2230
What number has 5 ten thousands, 1 more thousand than ten thousands, 4 more hundreds than ten thousands, 6 fewer tens than hundreds, and 4 more ones than tens?
71,454?? It may not be right but that's my
What number has 9 ten thousands the same number of thousands as ten thousands 8 fewer hundreds than ten thousands 6 more tens than hundreds and 6 fewer ones than thousands?
Having: 9 ten-thousands → 90,000 the same number of thousands as ten thousands → 9 ten-thousands: 9 thousands → 9,000 8 fewer hundreds than ten-thousands → 9 ten-thousand: 9 - 8 = 1 hundreds → 100 6 more tens than hundreds → 1 hundreds: 1 + 6 = 7 tens → 70 6 fewer ones than thousands → 9 thousands: 9 - 6 = 3 ones → 3 → the number is 90,000 + 9,000 + 100 + 70 + 3 = 99,173.
What number has 3 thousands 5 more hundreds than thousands 6 more tens than thousands and 2 fewer ones than hundreds?
3896
What number has 2 thousands 2 more hundreds than thousands 7 more tens than thousands and 5 more ones than hundreds?
The smallest such number is 2499.
What number has 6 thousands 5 fewer hundreds than thousands 2 more tens than hundreds and no ones?
6,130 has.
What number has 7 thousands 5 fewer hundreds than thousands 3 more tens than hundreds and 5 fewer ones than thousands?
7252
What number has 4 thousands 3 fewer hundreds than thousands 3 fewer tens than thousands and 6 more ones than hundreds?
4117
What number has 8 thousands 6 fewer than thousands 2 fewer than thousands and 4 more units than hundreds?
I think the number that has 8 thousands 6 fewer than thousands 2 fewer than the thousands and four more units than hundreds is 8624.
What number has 4 thousands 2 more hundreds than thousands 5 more tens than thousands and 2 fewer ones than thousands?
It is 4692.
Which is correct - 'Hundreds of thousands of people' or 'hundreds and thousands of people'?
Hundreds of thousands of people! Answer hundreds and thousands of people Answer As you can see, both alternatives are used, and probably they are equally correct. I would tend to use "of". You may have heard people say "tens of thousands", and this is correct usage as well. The idea is that "tens" and "hundreds" are ways to give a rough idea of scale. I could say "There are thousands of people in New York City." "Thousands" is not entirely wrong; there are in fact many, many thousands of people there (a thousand thousands for each million). But thousands isn't the best estimate of magnitude. If I say "thousands", I mean a few thousand, maybe even a few more than 10. But if I say "tens of thousands", I mean, perhaps, 30, 40, 50, 60 thousand. Thousands, around the order of magnitude "10". Hundreds and thousands, to my ear, does not convey the same general magnitude of size. Of course, there is nothing even remotely accurate about these estimates, but they help us grasp what the speaker is attempting to convey. Hundreds and thousands means multiples of hundreds (100s) and/or thousands (1000s). But hundreds of thousands (100000s) means multiples of a much bigger number indeed. So both are correct expressions but they convey the idea of quite different sizes of number.
