mk
decimal point to the left of the whole number. Example: 1= whole number. Less than 1 as a decimal is .00, .01, 02 etc.
No because .021 is greater than .01
Without a decimal point, they are both the same. If you asked "Which is less .01 or .001", then .001 is the smaller number.
.01
There are an infinite number of possible answers.For example:.09%.009%.0009%.08%.089%.0899%.01%.019%.001%.0017%0%-100%
The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6
decimal point to the left of the whole number. Example: 1= whole number. Less than 1 as a decimal is .00, .01, 02 etc.
Less than, 8.54 is .01 less than 8.55
No because .021 is greater than .01
Less than Perfect was created on 2002-10-01.
Without a decimal point, they are both the same. If you asked "Which is less .01 or .001", then .001 is the smaller number.
.01
Less Than Human - novel - was created on 2004-10-01.
Less than .01%.
1
Simplest . . . 1/9Mixed number . . . not possible, because 8/72 is less than ' 1 '.If you absolutely must have a mixed number, then it's 01/9 .
Since 0.5 is a fraction whose absolute value is less than one, it does cannot be represented properly as a mixed number. However, if pushed, I suggest 0.5 = 01/2