See Benford's Law.
Chat with our AI personalities
If there are no recurring numbers than the answer would be no mode, or 0.
Since the number 866 is not divisible by 3, this is impossible. The three numbers which differ by 1 and add to make 866 are: 287.6 recurring (that is, 287.6666...) 288.6 recurring 289.6 recurring
Most numbers with a defined endpoint are not irrational. Therefore, 1.33333333333 is not an irrational number, but 1.3 recurring is an irrational number.Ans. 21.3 recurring is not irrational. In general any decimal that has a repeated pattern that continues to infinity is rational.1.3 recurring is just 4/3.
which number equals to 68%
That would probably be included in the fear of numbers: numerophobia or arithmophobia.