5,4
10
Dodging numbers may be missing numbers in a sequence. For example, the underscore in the following sequence represents such a number: 2, 4, _ , 8, 10.
27. But that continues the sequence, it does not complete it.
20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
Even numbers.
Consider the sequence (a_i) where a_i is pi rounded to the i_th decimal place. This sequence clearly contains only rational numbers since every number in it has a finite decimal expansion. Furthermore this sequence is Cauchy since a_i and a_j can differ at most by 10^(-min(i,j)) or something which can be made arbitrarily small by choosing a lower bound for i and j. Now note that this sequence converges to pi in the reals, so it can not converge in the set of rational numbers. Therefore the rational numbers allow a non-convergent Cauchy sequence and are thus by definition not complete.
10
27 BUT, as far as I can tell, it does not complete the sequence which can continue further.
50 Each term in the sequence is 5 times the previous term.
1, 4, 7, 10, 13, …
Dodging numbers may be missing numbers in a sequence. For example, the underscore in the following sequence represents such a number: 2, 4, _ , 8, 10.
If the sequence matters: 720If the sequence doesn't matter: 120
5
75
27. But that continues the sequence, it does not complete it.
There are not 10 laws of composite numbers so the question is based on a complete misunderstanding of what composite numbers are!
27