Zero can be neither the numerator nor the denominator of a fraction.
zero.
any fraction
The answer depends on the part of the question that is missing.
No. The reason you can multiply a fraction by (x/x) to find an equivalent fraction is because for almost any x, (x/x) = 1. This is not the case for zero. Zero divided by zero does NOT equal 1, so multiplying the fraction by a value not equal to 1 will create a different fraction.
There are no such fractions. No matter how close a fraction is to zero, there are still infinitely many that are closer.
Negative half.
By which fraction is closest to "60," I assume you mean which fraction is closest to 60 %. The answer would be 3/5ths.
Any fraction that has a zero as the numerator equals zero. Any fraction that does not have a zero in the numerator would be a nonzero fraction.
The fraction is zero. 0 divided by anything except zero is zero.
The rule is if the numerator is zero than the value of the fraction is zero.
Zero can be neither the numerator nor the denominator of a fraction.
"Zero point" is 0. It is an integer, not a fraction.
-9 over anything but zero is a fraction. Division by zero is undefined.
Fractions are infinitely dense and this means that between any two fractions there an infinite number of fractions. If any fraction, f, laid claims to being the nearest, there would be infinitely many fractions between 0 and f and so infinitely many fractions which were closer to 0. This means that f could not be the closest. The argument can be used again and again and so there cannot be a fraction closest to 0.
You can't change a fraction when the numerator is zero because no matter what the denominator is the fraction is still zero. A zero denominator is not allowed because you cannot divide by zero.
Zero