2 mm is smaller.
No. The units are the same (mm) so the numbers can be compared directly. 2 < 3 → 2 mm < 3 mm. → 2 mm is less than 3 mm, ie 2 mm is not larger than 3 mm.
2300 mm = 2300 x 10-3 m = 2,300 m = 2,3 m which is smaller than 22 m 2300 mm < 22 m
Smaller... 2 ft 3 in = 27 inches in total.
1 m = 1,000 mm 2 m = 2,000 mm 3 m = 3,000 mm 4 m = 4,000 mm 5 m = 5,000 mm 6 m = 6,000 mm
The surface area of a prism is twice the area of the end plus the area of all the sides. For a prism with a polygon cross-section the area of all the sides if given by the perimeter of the cross-section polygon multiplied by the length of the prism. Assuming you have a prism of cross-section that is a rectangle with sides 4 mm and 3 mm, and is 15 mm long (ie it is an oblong), its surface area is: → surface_area = 2 × (4 mm × 3 mm) + 2 × (4 mm + 3 mm) × 15 mm → surface area = 2 × 12 mm² + 14 mm × 15 mm = 234 mm²
2mm
200 mm is smaller than 2 cm. (2 cm is 2000 mm)
No. The units are the same (mm) so the numbers can be compared directly. 2 < 3 → 2 mm < 3 mm. → 2 mm is less than 3 mm, ie 2 mm is not larger than 3 mm.
To convert mm to inches divide by 25.4 2 or 3 mm = 2/25.4 or 3/25.4 inches
Sand particles typically range in size from 0.0625 mm to 2 mm, silt particles range from 0.002 mm to 0.0625 mm, and clay particles are smaller than 0.002 mm in size.
they are 2 different units in measurement mm=length mg= weight
To calculate 2 - 5 mM, you subtract 5 mM from 2 mM, which results in a value of -3 mM. This indicates that the result is negative, meaning that 2 mM is not sufficient to reach 5 mM. In practical terms, it suggests a deficit of 3 mM.
There are 32 millimeters in 3 cm 2 mm. One centimeter has 10 millimeters, so 3 cm is equal to 30 mm, and adding 2 mm to that gives a total of 32 mm.
It is: 2(3*5)+2(5*8)+2(3*8) = 104 square mm
2 cm 3 mm = 23 millimetres
1 cm = 10 mm... that means 3 cm 2 mm = 32 mm
0.1mm is smaller then 0.24!