The answer depends on what you were trying to predict.
better - comparativebest - superlativeJon is better at maths than me.My sister is the best at maths in her class.Comparative :better- superlative : bestThe comparative form of "good" is "better", and the superlative form of "good" is "best". "Better" is used when comparing two things. "Best" is used when comparing more than two things. For example, the blue notebook is better than the red one. (Two things are being compared.) Out of the three notebooks, the blue one is the best. (Three things are being compared.)Good; Better; Best
That all depends upon the density of the liquid in question. For fuel for motor vehicles, density varies quite a bit with temperature meaning it is better to fill up your vehicle first thing in the morning after a cold night as you'll get more fuel for your money, but remember that unless you are going to use [quite] a bit immediately, leave room for it to expand as it warms up.
Well, honey, the slope of a line is more accurate for density because it takes into account multiple data points, giving you a better overall picture of the relationship between mass and volume. A single sample can be like relying on one bad date to judge all of Tinder - you need more data to make a solid conclusion. So, slope it up and get that density with some sass!
To measure mass use gramsto measure volume use liters or cubic centimetersto measure density use grams per cubic centimeterif you want a better answer you should specify which property of water you wish to measure
Oh honey, comparing farmers and teachers is like comparing apples and oranges. Both are essential in their own ways. Farmers grow the food we eat, while teachers shape the minds of future generations. So, let's not pit them against each other and just appreciate the hard work they both do, shall we?
Yes.
There may or may not be a benefit: it depends on the underlying distributions. Using the standard normal distribution, whatever the circumstances is naive and irresponsible. Also, it depends on what parameter you are testing for. For comparing whether or not two distributions are the same, tests such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test or the Chi-Square goodness of fit test are often better. For testing the equality of variance, an F-test may be better.
alpha. it's a more private testing.
My prediction is that bounty or the more expensive types of towels are better because they probably have a different kind of material or texture than the cheaper kinds.But that is a prediction the cheaper brands could be as well, my prediction stands at the bounty brand and the more expensive brand.
Random drug testing is better because it does not allow people the opportunity to prepare for the test.
Better than what? - It isn't clear what you are comparing with what.
the goal of testing is to answer the unanswered questions of our universe and to have a better understanding of the concept we are testing.
One way to increase the density of lifting clouds and improve weather prediction models is by using advanced technology like high-resolution satellite imagery and radar data. These tools can provide more detailed information about the atmosphere, allowing meteorologists to better understand the behavior of clouds and make more accurate predictions. Additionally, incorporating data from weather balloons and other observational sources can help improve the overall accuracy of weather forecasts.
It depends on what you're comparing this to.
Comparing digital cameras all depends on what you are looking for in a camera. Try comparing the megapixels on the camera. The higher the megapixel, the better the picture it will produce.
There is currently no way to remove the prediction option on Facebook Search. This is a popular feature that allows individuals to better find friends and groups, which is likely why it is a permanent option.
Comparing to human a Tiger can see six time better in day and five time better in night.