There may or may not be a benefit: it depends on the underlying distributions. Using the standard normal distribution, whatever the circumstances is naive and irresponsible. Also, it depends on what parameter you are testing for.
For comparing whether or not two distributions are the same, tests such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test or the Chi-Square goodness of fit test are often better. For testing the equality of variance, an F-test may be better.
Transforming data from different distributions to conform to a standard distribution, such as the normal distribution, allows for easier comparison and analysis. It standardizes the data, making it possible to apply statistical methods that assume normality, facilitating the use of z-scores and other techniques. This transformation also helps in identifying patterns and relationships across diverse datasets, enhancing interpretability and the validity of inferences drawn from the analysis.
Yes. Normal (or Gaussian) distribution are parametric distributions and they are defined by two parameters: the mean and the variance (square of standard deviation). Each pair of these parameters gives rise to a different normal distribution. However, they can all be "re-parametrised" to the standard normal distribution using z-transformations. The standard normal distribution has mean 0 and variance 1.
There are no benefits in doing something that cannot be done. The standard normal distribution is not transformed to the standard distribution because the latter does not exist.
Z-scores standardize data from various distributions by transforming individual data points into a common scale based on their mean and standard deviation. This process involves subtracting the mean from each data point and dividing by the standard deviation, resulting in a distribution with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. This transformation enables comparisons across different datasets by converting them to the standard normal distribution, facilitating statistical analysis and interpretation.
Yes. And that is true of most probability distributions.
Transforming data from different distributions to conform to a standard distribution, such as the normal distribution, allows for easier comparison and analysis. It standardizes the data, making it possible to apply statistical methods that assume normality, facilitating the use of z-scores and other techniques. This transformation also helps in identifying patterns and relationships across diverse datasets, enhancing interpretability and the validity of inferences drawn from the analysis.
Yes. Normal (or Gaussian) distribution are parametric distributions and they are defined by two parameters: the mean and the variance (square of standard deviation). Each pair of these parameters gives rise to a different normal distribution. However, they can all be "re-parametrised" to the standard normal distribution using z-transformations. The standard normal distribution has mean 0 and variance 1.
There are no benefits in doing something that cannot be done. The standard normal distribution is not transformed to the standard distribution because the latter does not exist.
Check the lecture on t distributions at StatLect. It is explained there.
The normal distribution, also known as the Gaussian distribution, has a familiar "bell curve" shape and approximates many different naturally occurring distributions over real numbers.
Z-scores standardize data from various distributions by transforming individual data points into a common scale based on their mean and standard deviation. This process involves subtracting the mean from each data point and dividing by the standard deviation, resulting in a distribution with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. This transformation enables comparisons across different datasets by converting them to the standard normal distribution, facilitating statistical analysis and interpretation.
Yes. And that is true of most probability distributions.
In statistics, the "z" in a z-distribution refers to a standardized score known as a z-score. This score indicates how many standard deviations an individual data point is from the mean of a distribution. The z-distribution is a specific type of normal distribution with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, allowing for comparison of scores from different normal distributions.
the t distributions take into account the variability of the sample standard deviations. I think that it is now common to use the t distribution when the population standard deviation is unknown, regardless of the sample size.
You make comparisons between their mean or median, their spread - as measured bu the inter-quartile range or standard deviation, their skewness, the underlying distributions.
standard deviation is best measure of dispersion because all the data distributions are nearer to the normal distribution.
Because the z-score table, which is heavily related to standard deviation, is only applicable to normal distributions.