No - 0.8 is a decimal number, not an integer. The closest integer is 1.
Real numbers include fractional and decimal numbers. So the closest-to-zero positive real number would be 0.00000000...001; that is, an an infinite number of zeros between the decimal and the 1.
The square root of 240 is irrational; the closest number depends upon how many decimal places you want. If you want the closest whole number then: √240 = 15.49193... → closest whole number is 15.
Divide it out, 5/6 = 0.8333, so its closest to 1
The whole number closest to the square root of 65 is 8. The whole number closest to the square root of 65 is 8.
2 is the largest prime number closest to 1.
1
1
Number one is the cylinder closest to the radiator.Number one is the cylinder closest to the radiator.
It is: 1 or -1
1.0 if the same number is permitted. If not, there is no such thing as a CLOSEST decimal. If you are given one decimal with the claim of being the closest, the average of that number and 1 will be a decimal that is closer. Without averaging, the closest would be 0.999 with infinite 9s
It is closest to 1.
Starting with the numbers 1 and 1, then the closest number I found was 9,227,465You can run the series pretty easy in an MS-Excel Spreadsheet.
The number 1 is the closest whole number to 1.283.
Number one is closest to the radiator.
The one closest to the radiator is number 1.
Closest to serpentine belt.