It is: 7258 and 7285-7258 = 27
It would be a smaller number, but without knowing what fraction it is raised to, you can't tell how much smaller.
The result of the calculation ( 9999999990 - 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 ) is ( -9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999990 ). Essentially, you are subtracting a very large number from a much smaller one, resulting in a large negative number.
No they do not, take a big prime number and compare it to a smaller composite number. The number 6833 as only two factors (divisors), namely 1 and itself. But the number 68 which is much smaller has more factors or divisors. 68 has 2 and 4 and 17 and 1 and itself which is already more divisors than 6833.
Ten times smaller.
A 100 is ten times smaller than a 1000
SO pretty much, you would fit the smaller number into the bigger number, and turn the extras into a negitave (ex. 6-8=(-2)
It would be a smaller number, but without knowing what fraction it is raised to, you can't tell how much smaller.
The litre would be a much smaller number.
I suspect the answer you are looking for is an outlier.
The Namib is the smallest major desert in Africa. However, there are a number of much smaller deserts in a number of African countries.
Nitrogen has a much smaller atomic number, specifically 7, than either chromium (24) or radon (86).
No much smaller actually.
Much, MUCH smaller than the smallest star.
Much smaller
American Wire Guage. The smaller the number the larger the wire. As in an AWG 14/2 wire is much smaller than an AWG 10/2 wire.
Antarctica is much, much smaller than Africa.
Much smaller.