0
Because you need information about all three parts of the triangle, either the side or the angle opposite it, for each of the sides of a triangle.
In AA you are missing the third angle, you could have a triangle where both angles were the same but the height could be different giving you a taller or shorter triangle.
In SSA, the angle would be the one opposite the first side, so you have no information about the third side
What else can I help you with?
What is a valid claim in math?
A valid claim in math is that you prove whenether the question or answer is resonable. in other words, you have to tell if it is biased or not biased. Biased is invalid claim.
Is the statement P q valid?
No, it is not valid because there is no operator between P and q.
What is a valid conclusion based kn the information presented in the graphs?
a valid conclusion based on the information in the graph is that
Is this valid no x is y some z is x some z are not y?
It is logically valid but not grammatically.
What type of value does a valid values list (VVL) contain?
What type of values does a valid values list (VVL) contain?
Can you use the ASA Postulate or the AAS Theorem to prove the triangles congruent?
Yes, you can use either the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) Postulate or the AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) Theorem to prove triangles congruent, as both are valid methods for establishing congruence. ASA requires two angles and the included side to be known, while AAS involves two angles and a non-included side. If you have the necessary information for either case, you can successfully prove the triangles are congruent.
Which method shows the two triangles are congruent sss sas asa AAA?
To determine if two triangles are congruent, the methods available are SSS (Side-Side-Side), SAS (Side-Angle-Side), and ASA (Angle-Side-Angle). AAA (Angle-Angle-Angle) does not prove congruence because it only shows that triangles are similar, not necessarily the same size. Therefore, SSS, SAS, and ASA are valid methods for establishing congruence, while AAA is not.
Would you use SSS or SAS to prove the triangle congruent?
To prove two triangles congruent, you would typically use SSS (Side-Side-Side) if you have the lengths of all three sides of both triangles. Alternatively, SAS (Side-Angle-Side) can be used if you know two sides and the included angle of one triangle, along with the corresponding two sides and the included angle of the other triangle. The choice between SSS and SAS depends on the information available about the triangles in question. Both methods are valid for establishing triangle congruence.
Does a parellelogram have four congruent triangles?
Yes. Read on for why: Take a parallelogram ABCD with midpoints E and F in the bases. So something like this (forgive the "drawing"): A E B __.__ /__.__/ C F D We know that parallelogram AEFC = EBDF, since they have the same base (F bisects CD, so CF = FD), height (haven't touched that), and angles (<ACF = <EFD because they're parallel - trust me that everything else matches). We also know that every parallelogram can be divided into two congruent triangles along their diagonal. So if two congruent parallelograms consistent of two congruent triangles each, then all four triangles are congruent. So your congruent triangles are ACF, AEF, EFD, and EBD. You can further reinforce this through ASA triangle congruency proofs (as I did at first), but this is a far more concise and equally valid answer.
The sum of the perimeters of two congruent triangles is three times the perimeter of the first triangle?
Let's denote the perimeter of the first triangle as P. Since the triangles are congruent, the perimeter of the second triangle is also P. The sum of their perimeters is then 2P. According to the given statement, this sum is three times the perimeter of the first triangle. So we have the equation 2P = 3P. Simplifying, we find that P = 0, which is not a valid solution. Therefore, there is no triangle for which the sum of the perimeters of two congruent triangles is three times the perimeter of the first triangle.
If you signed a contract while you were stoned and you can prove you were incapacitated is that contract valid?
No
Is a quitclaim deed valid if the grantor had dementia at time of signing?
No, but you will need to prove that.
What are methods are valid ways to polarize waves?
transmission and scattering
What is a valid claim in math?
A valid claim in math is that you prove whenether the question or answer is resonable. in other words, you have to tell if it is biased or not biased. Biased is invalid claim.
Can a levy on your checking account be reversed?
Yes. If the account holder can prove that the judgment levy is not valid.
Why is it when you use the pythagorean theorem only the positive square root is used?
Negative distances are not really valid as dimensions for sides of triangles,
What is a valid email address for facebook?
Any email address that you can prove you have ownership of (by clicking a confirmation link sent during registration) counts as a valid email address.
