Because you need information about all three parts of the triangle, either the side or the angle opposite it, for each of the sides of a triangle.
In AA you are missing the third angle, you could have a triangle where both angles were the same but the height could be different giving you a taller or shorter triangle.
In SSA, the angle would be the one opposite the first side, so you have no information about the third side
A valid claim in math is that you prove whenether the question or answer is resonable. in other words, you have to tell if it is biased or not biased. Biased is invalid claim.
No, it is not valid because there is no operator between P and q.
It is logically valid but not grammatically.
a valid conclusion based on the information in the graph is that
What type of values does a valid values list (VVL) contain?
Yes. Read on for why: Take a parallelogram ABCD with midpoints E and F in the bases. So something like this (forgive the "drawing"): A E B __.__ /__.__/ C F D We know that parallelogram AEFC = EBDF, since they have the same base (F bisects CD, so CF = FD), height (haven't touched that), and angles (<ACF = <EFD because they're parallel - trust me that everything else matches). We also know that every parallelogram can be divided into two congruent triangles along their diagonal. So if two congruent parallelograms consistent of two congruent triangles each, then all four triangles are congruent. So your congruent triangles are ACF, AEF, EFD, and EBD. You can further reinforce this through ASA triangle congruency proofs (as I did at first), but this is a far more concise and equally valid answer.
Let's denote the perimeter of the first triangle as P. Since the triangles are congruent, the perimeter of the second triangle is also P. The sum of their perimeters is then 2P. According to the given statement, this sum is three times the perimeter of the first triangle. So we have the equation 2P = 3P. Simplifying, we find that P = 0, which is not a valid solution. Therefore, there is no triangle for which the sum of the perimeters of two congruent triangles is three times the perimeter of the first triangle.
No
transmission and scattering
No, but you will need to prove that.
A valid claim in math is that you prove whenether the question or answer is resonable. in other words, you have to tell if it is biased or not biased. Biased is invalid claim.
Yes. If the account holder can prove that the judgment levy is not valid.
Negative distances are not really valid as dimensions for sides of triangles,
publish the data in an academic journal
Any email address that you can prove you have ownership of (by clicking a confirmation link sent during registration) counts as a valid email address.
No, they are a way by which creditors can evaluate the credit worthiness of their potential clients and reduce the risk of making bad loans. However it certainly is valid to ask if the methods used to collect the data and calculate the scores are valid methods.
If you can prove they didn't make a valid effort to serve you in person.