Good. And that is the question?
If the numerical apertures of the condenser and low power objective lenses are 1.25 and 0.205 respectively and you are supplied with a filter that selects a wavelength of 521 nm then the answer is YES! 520/(1.25 + 0.25) = 347 nm and your two points in question are shorter in distance as they are only 330 nm apart.
520
1 gram = 1000mg 520 grams = 520*1000 =520.000mg
1.9231
520/1 and 8,840/17
If the numerical apertures of the condenser and low power objective lenses are 1.25 and 0.205 respectively and you are supplied with a filter that selects a wavelength of 521 nm then the answer is YES! 520/(1.25 + 0.25) = 347 nm and your two points in question are shorter in distance as they are only 330 nm apart.
Roughly 520-570 nanometres.
Roughly 520-570 nanometres.
-- I have to assume that the '520' figure is also a wavelength in nm.-- The energy of a photon is proportional to its frequency. That also meansthat the energy is inversely proportional to its wavelength. So the photonwith the greater wavelength has less energy.-- 720/520 = 1.385The shorter-wave photon has 38.5% more energy than the longer-wave one.-- 520/720 = 0.722The longer wave photon has 72.2% as much energy as the shorter-wave one has.
Yellow- wavelength between 570 and 590 nm Hope this helps
Green light is roughly 520-570 nm in wavelength.
The wavelength IS 518 nanometers.... but in meters, it is expressed as 5.18 x 10-7 m. when you multiply by the conversion factor of 10-9
520
It is 520
Theoretically all colours except Green sot that only green light of wavelength 520 can pass through
520
520