If the numerical apertures of the condenser and low power objective lenses are 1.25 and 0.205 respectively and you are supplied with a filter that selects a wavelength of 521 nm then the answer is YES! 520/(1.25 + 0.25) = 347 nm and your two points in question are shorter in distance as they are only 330 nm apart.
Yes
According to Wikipedia (see link), a human eye with excellent acuity can distinguish between lines that are 0.35 mm apart, held at a distance of 1 meter. That is 350 micrometres or 350,000 nm - somewhat larger than the 250 nm in the question!
It is not necessary - it is a convention to distinguish between the end points of a range being included or not in the solution.
Not set apart from others by visible marks; to make distinctive or discernible by exhibiting differences; to mark off by some characteristic., To separate by definition of terms or logical division of a subject with regard to difference; as, to distinguish sounds into high and low., To recognize or discern by marks, signs, or characteristic quality or qualities; to know and discriminate (anything) from other things with which it might be confounded; as, to distinguish the sound of a drum., To constitute a difference; to make to differ., To separate from others by a mark of honor; to make eminent or known; to confer distinction upon; -- with by or for., To make distinctions; to perceive the difference; to exercise discrimination; -- with between; as, a judge distinguishes between cases apparently similar, but differing in principle., To become distinguished or distinctive; to make one's self or itself discernible.
Any two points lie on the same line, since a line can be drawn through any two points.Three points that lie on the same line are described as being "collinear" points.
No, you will not be able to distinguish two points that are 300 nm apart as being separate using standard optical microscopy, due to the diffraction limit of light, which is typically around 200-250 nm. Techniques like electron microscopy, which do not rely on visible light, can resolve much smaller distances and could distinguish points that close together.
Whether two points that are 300 nm apart can be distinguished as separate depends on the resolving power of the imaging technique used. For optical microscopy, the diffraction limit typically allows resolution down to about 200 nm, meaning that points 300 nm apart may appear as a single blur. However, techniques like electron microscopy, which have higher resolution capabilities, could distinguish them as separate points. Thus, the ability to distinguish depends on the method employed.
Yes
Whether two points 330 nm apart can be distinguished as separate depends on the resolution limit of the imaging technique used. For optical microscopy, the diffraction limit typically restricts resolution to about 200-250 nm, meaning that points closer than this may blur together. However, techniques like electron microscopy can achieve much higher resolution, allowing for the distinction of points separated by 330 nm. Therefore, the ability to distinguish them depends on the method employed.
According to Wikipedia (see link), a human eye with excellent acuity can distinguish between lines that are 0.35 mm apart, held at a distance of 1 meter. That is 350 micrometres or 350,000 nm - somewhat larger than the 250 nm in the question!
Resolution describes the ability of a microscope to distinguish two objects as being separate. It is the smallest amount of detail that can be observed by a microscope.
One can define separate as being apart. It may also mean to keep apart or divide, to remove or break an association with something or someone. Separate can be used as a verb, adjective or noun.
The distance between horizontal data points on Earth's surface can vary depending on the specific data being collected and the resolution of the measurements. In general, data points can range from being spaced a few meters apart to several kilometers apart. Advanced technologies like GPS allow for highly accurate positioning with data points only a few centimeters apart in some cases.
"apart" (To be away) means separate i.e. I took my watch apart, or Our birthdays are three days apart, etc."a part" (To be together) means 'part of' i.e. France is a part of Europe.
Once married, you remain so until you die or are legally separated (divorced). Just being separate (apart) is not enough to be "unmarried",
In the context of being separate from the ordinary or mundane, the term "holy" refers to something that is considered sacred, pure, or set apart for a divine purpose.
It is not necessary - it is a convention to distinguish between the end points of a range being included or not in the solution.