Im Pretty sure it should be
"This Statement is False"
It is largely a matter of definition. It also could be: "Green ideas sleep furiously."
Wolfgang Pauli had little patience with poorly phrased or poorly structured propositions. He said on occasion: "This is not right; it isn't even wrong!"
It is best to regard such a statement as neither right nor wrong, but meaningless. One good test (not universal, but useful) is to see whether the negation of the statement is true. A logically valid statement in most systems is either right or wrong; if it is right its negation is wrong and if it is wrong its negation is right.
Let us try the test on the above examples:
"This statement is not false." That is neither more obviously true than "This statement is false", nor more obviously false.
"Green ideas do not sleep furiously" That too is not particularly true or false; what does it mean for an idea to be green or to sleep? Or for sleeping to be furious or not?
Those two statements accordingly are not meaningful by our test.
Consider two other statements:
2+2=4
and
2+3=7
(Note, I did not say 2+2 eggs or drops of water, just abstract 2+2, right?)
Are those statements meaningful? One seems to be wrong, but it still does seem meaningful. Lets try negating the statements, by replacing the = with <> meaning "either greater or less, and therefore not equal"
Our true statement: 2+2=4 becomes 2+2<>4, which is false. That suggests that either way around it is meaningful, whether true or false.
Our false statement 2+3=7 becomes 2+3<>7 which is true. That suggests that either way around this statement also is meaningful, whether true or false.
Gloves
A glove.
EMILIA
imprisoned
Oedipus' father
Each of the "following" statement is neither true nor false.
Those are not "statements", but numbers. As such, they are neither true nor false.
If you use a variable, or variables, with an equation, or with an inequality, it is neither true nor false until you replace the variables with specific values.
Neither true nor false. It depends on what you're trying to ask.
This is true
False, bone contains capillaries.
They are neither plant nor animal
"Laws are made to be broken" is a popular phrase based on opinion. It is neither true nor false.
The answer depends on your definition of statement, It is a grammatical correct English declarative sentence which may be a statement by one definition. However, in logic, a statement is defined to be a sentence that is either true or false but not both. This sentence is not a statement by this definition.It is neither true nor false, because if is true, since it says it is false, it is false. If it is false. then is true since that is exactly what it says.Please see the related question for more about this famous paradox.
-1 is -1. It can be neither true nor false as there is no equality or inequality sign.
In the logical sense, sentences must be either true or false and not both. "This sentence is false" cannot be true because that would mean that it is false, and it cannot be both. It also cannot be false because that would mean that it is true, and it cannot be both. Therefore, if it is true or false, then it is both true and false. Therefore it is either neither true nor false or both true and false; therefore, in the logical sense, it is not a sentence. However, it says it is a sentence; therefore, it is lying; therefore, it is false.
No, this statement is not accurate. Along a sliding boundary, called a transform boundary, the crust is neither created nor destroyed. Instead, the crust is transformed horizontally as two tectonic plates slide past each other.