Yes. If you end up where you started, your displacement is zero, but the distance you travel is the actual amount of ground covered. For example, if you made a round trip of 50 miles, your displacement would be zero miles, but your distance would be 50 miles. This is because the final position and the initial position are the same. Round trips always have a displacement of zero.
Yes, it is possible for displacement to be zero while distance is not. This can happen when an object moves in different directions and its total movement results in a non-zero distance, while the net change in position (displacement) from start to finish is zero.
Yes, it is possible to have zero displacement and a non-zero average velocity. This can occur if an object moves back and forth over a certain distance so that the total displacement is zero, but the average velocity is non-zero due to the object covering distance in both directions.
Yes, if no force is applied. Work = force x distance, so if the force is zero, no work is done.Yes, if no force is applied. Work = force x distance, so if the force is zero, no work is done.Yes, if no force is applied. Work = force x distance, so if the force is zero, no work is done.Yes, if no force is applied. Work = force x distance, so if the force is zero, no work is done.
Yes, displacement is how far are you from your original position. Therefore if you imagine walking around a circular path where you end up at the starting position, you've walked a certain distance however you havent been displaced (since your where you started).
No, it is not possible for an object's mass to be zero.
Yes, it is possible for displacement to be zero while distance is not. This can happen when an object moves in different directions and its total movement results in a non-zero distance, while the net change in position (displacement) from start to finish is zero.
Yes, the x-distance, y-distance, z-distance, or any combination of the three between any two points may be zero Not possible. If the distance between two points is zero then the points are the same.
No. Distance can be greater than displacement, but not less. The magnitude of the displacement between two points is also the minimum possible distance of a path between the same points.However, the displacement can be zero if the distance is not if the object's starting point and ending point are the same.
Yes, it is possible to have zero displacement and a non-zero average velocity. This can occur if an object moves back and forth over a certain distance so that the total displacement is zero, but the average velocity is non-zero due to the object covering distance in both directions.
Yes, if no force is applied. Work = force x distance, so if the force is zero, no work is done.Yes, if no force is applied. Work = force x distance, so if the force is zero, no work is done.Yes, if no force is applied. Work = force x distance, so if the force is zero, no work is done.Yes, if no force is applied. Work = force x distance, so if the force is zero, no work is done.
Yes, displacement is how far are you from your original position. Therefore if you imagine walking around a circular path where you end up at the starting position, you've walked a certain distance however you havent been displaced (since your where you started).
No, it is not possible for an object's mass to be zero.
The distance travelled by a particle cannot be zero when displacement is not zero because unlike distance which is a scalar, displacement is a vector quantity implying that it has both direction and magnitude.
Yes, the distance travelled by a particle can be zero even when the displacement is not zero. This can happen when the particle moves back and forth along the same path, resulting in a net displacement of zero but no actual distance covered.
It's called the absolute value. For example, the distance '3' is from zero is 3. However the distance -3 is from zero is also 3. The absolute value of -3 is 3.
The distance is 1 unit.
Yes, zero could be a possible solution to the equation.