Type your answer here... sources of optimal level
yerkes dodson law
strength of aroousal
difficulty of task
Yerkes and Dodson (1908) At low levels of arousal, performance will be below par, the athlete is not psyched up. As arousal increases so does performance, up to an optimal point. After this point, further increases in arousal lead to declines in performance. Each athlete has their own optimal level of arousal. Optimal arousal is higher for more simple tasks and lower for more complex tasks. Problems with inverted 'U' Theory * Critics question if optimal arousal always occurs at the mid-point of the curve. * One curve does not explain the different optimal levels of arousal needed for simple and complex tasks.
Arousal theory suggests that individuals seek to maintain an optimal level of physiological or mental arousal to perform at their best. This theory proposes that performance is influenced by the level of arousal, with both low and high arousal levels impeding performance. Different tasks require different levels of arousal for optimal performance.
The optimal arousal theory suggests that individuals seek to maintain an optimal level of arousal to perform best. In Aron Ralston's case, being trapped in a life-threatening situation like being alone and trapped in a canyon without any rescue in sight may have led to heightened arousal levels, which could have helped him stay alert and make decisions crucial to his survival. Ultimately, his ability to stay focused and determined may have been influenced by this theory.
Drive theories and arousal theories both explain behavior in terms of internal states. Drive theory posits that motivation arises from the need to reduce internal tension or satisfy biological needs, while arousal theory suggests that individuals are motivated to maintain an optimal level of arousal. The key difference is that drive theory focuses on reducing tension, while arousal theory emphasizes the desire to seek out stimulation to maintain an optimal level of arousal.
The arousal theory of motivation emphasizes that individuals seek an optimal level of arousal to perform best. It would be useful for understanding the aversive effects of situations where either too much or too little arousal can negatively impact performance, such as in high-stress environments or boring tasks.
Yerkes and Dodson (1908) At low levels of arousal, performance will be below par, the athlete is not psyched up. As arousal increases so does performance, up to an optimal point. After this point, further increases in arousal lead to declines in performance. Each athlete has their own optimal level of arousal. Optimal arousal is higher for more simple tasks and lower for more complex tasks. Problems with inverted 'U' Theory * Critics question if optimal arousal always occurs at the mid-point of the curve. * One curve does not explain the different optimal levels of arousal needed for simple and complex tasks.
Arousal theory suggests that individuals seek to maintain an optimal level of physiological or mental arousal to perform at their best. This theory proposes that performance is influenced by the level of arousal, with both low and high arousal levels impeding performance. Different tasks require different levels of arousal for optimal performance.
Medium arousal is optimal for performance. Too much or too little arousal hampers performance.Optimal Levels: For easy tasks- at the higher end; For harder tasks- at the lower end (since too much arousal causes anxiety)
under, over and optimal
The hypothesis states that performance improves with increasing levels of arousal up to an optimal point,beyond this optimal point of arousal can be detrimental to performance, as a result of this athletes may under perform due to being over or under aroused.
google. That tells you everything.
The optimal arousal theory suggests that individuals seek to maintain an optimal level of arousal to perform best. In Aron Ralston's case, being trapped in a life-threatening situation like being alone and trapped in a canyon without any rescue in sight may have led to heightened arousal levels, which could have helped him stay alert and make decisions crucial to his survival. Ultimately, his ability to stay focused and determined may have been influenced by this theory.
Arousal theory suggests that people are motivated to seek an optimal level of arousal or excitement. This theory proposes that individuals seek to maintain an ideal level of stimulation to feel motivated and engaged in their activities.
Drive theories and arousal theories both explain behavior in terms of internal states. Drive theory posits that motivation arises from the need to reduce internal tension or satisfy biological needs, while arousal theory suggests that individuals are motivated to maintain an optimal level of arousal. The key difference is that drive theory focuses on reducing tension, while arousal theory emphasizes the desire to seek out stimulation to maintain an optimal level of arousal.
To stir to action or strong response; excite: to arouse a crowd; to arouse suspicion.
The arousal theory of motivation emphasizes that individuals seek an optimal level of arousal to perform best. It would be useful for understanding the aversive effects of situations where either too much or too little arousal can negatively impact performance, such as in high-stress environments or boring tasks.
The multiple choice options for this question were: A.) Increases the optimal-arousal level B.) Suppresses the immune system C.) Decreases the optimal-arousal level D.) Suppresses the adrenal gland E.) Decreases the blood flow The answer is B.