More or less, yes.
No it would be a theorem if it was proven.
I don't think there is such a thing as the "supersonic theory". If you mean "superstring theory", no, they are not the same.
It can be proven to an extent but if the sides of a right angle triangle are equal in length then using Pythagoras' theorem is impossible to exactly find the length of its hypotenuse which will always be an irrational number that can't be determined.It is a theorem, not a theory. They are not the same. A theorem is shown to be true based on axioms, what is already known to be true. It does not need to be proven using a scientific method.
in this theorem we will neglect the given resistance and in next step mean as second step we will solve
They are the same thing.
The gougu theorem was the Chinese version of the Pythagorean theorem, they stated the same principle
a theorem rather, it has to be proven to become an accepted theory.
a theorem rather, it has to be proven to become an accepted theory.
No, bars and measures are the same thing in music theory. They refer to the same concept of dividing music into equal segments of time.
They are the same thing.
As an abstract idea, a theorem would not be patentable.
no. vertices are corners basically, and edges are edges. Eullers theorem Faces+Vertices=Edges+2.