answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

63 does not have fewest prime factors. It is a product of 3, 3 and 7.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

No. 64 has fewer.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

No.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Does 63 have the fewest prime number?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Are 47 and 63 prime?

47 is a prime number - but 63 is not a prime number.


Which has the fewest prime factors 63 or 32 or 100 49?

49 has one distinct prime factor, two altogether.


Which has the fewest prime factors 63 32 49 100?

49 has one distinct prime factor, two altogether.


Which has the fewest prime factors 63 or 32?

32=2^5=5 factors 63=3^2 x 7=3 factors 63 has fewer


Out of 63 32 49 and 100 which has the fewest number of prime factors?

63 = 3*3*332 = 2*2*2*2*249 = 7*7100 = 2*2*5*5Out of these numbers 63,32 & 49 has only one prime factor.


Whick if these is not prime number 73 89 63 and 73?

63 is not a prime number.


Is 63 a mersenne prime number?

No, as 63 = 7 x 9 and then is not a prime number


Does 100 49 63 or 32 have the fewest prime factors?

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 32 7 x 7 = 49 3 x 3 x 7 = 63 2 x 2 x 5 x 5 = 100 49 has the fewest prime factors. 32 and 49 have the fewest distinct prime factors.


Is 63 a a prime number?

No. 63 = 3 * 3 * 763 is not a prime number because it has more than two factors and so therefore it is a composite number.


What is the prime number between 63 and 65?

There isn't a prime number between 63 and 65


Find three consecutive odd integers whose sum is 63?

63 / 3 = 21The middle number is 21The odd numbers next to 21 are 19 and 2319 + 21 + 23 = 63


Is 63 prime or composite number?

composite number. 9x7=63