answersLogoWhite

0

For a rectangle, do the following:
1. Count the number of cubes on one side of the retangle.
2. Count the number of cubes on an adjacent side (not the opposite side)
3. Multiple both numbers together. The result is your answer.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
More answers

You could find the number of cubes in one layer without counting by, measuring the cubes

User Avatar

Anonymous

4y ago
User Avatar

hi bby

User Avatar

Anonymous

4y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How could you find the number of cubes in one layer without counting?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

How can you find the volume of a box without counting the unit cubes?

Measure its length, breadth and height and multiply these together.


How many cubes of sugar are in a can of malt?

Oh, dude, like, there are about 9 cubes of sugar in a typical can of malt. But hey, who's counting, right? It's all about enjoying that sweet, bubbly goodness without worrying about the numbers. Just sip and chill, man.


How do you describe a way to find how many cubes will fit in a rectangular box without building the box and filling it with cubes?

One way to find out the number of cubes that can fit inside a rectangular box is to use its volume. Knowing the volume of the cubes and that of the box can give an accurate reading of the cubes that can fit.


How do you count edges of a cube?

All cubes have 12 edges. I got that just by counting all the lines.


What is the number of cubes a 3D figure can hold called?

There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.