No! Correlation by itself is not sufficient to infer or prove causation.
correlation implies the cause and effect relationship,, but casuality doesn't imply correlation.
Correlation is when two things are related or have similar properties. They can exist independently. Causation means that one thing made the other thing happen
Causation, correlation...
NO. correlation just (implies) a relationship ... for example, both may be caused by the same thing.
Correlation alone cannot be able to complicate causation.
No! Correlation by itself is not sufficient to infer or prove causation.
does not prove
correlation implies the cause and effect relationship,, but casuality doesn't imply correlation.
Causation cannot be determined.
Correlation is when two things are related or have similar properties. They can exist independently. Causation means that one thing made the other thing happen
It confuses correlation with causation
Causation, correlation...
Historical causation and correlation both involve relationships between events or variables. However, causation implies a direct relationship where one event causes another, while correlation suggests a statistical relationship where changes in one event may be associated with changes in another, without implying causation. Both concepts are used to interpret patterns in data or events.
NO. correlation just (implies) a relationship ... for example, both may be caused by the same thing.
both have connections between multiple events
Correlation is a statistical measure of the linear association between two variables. It is important to remember that correlation does not mean causation and also that the absence of correlation does not mean the two variables are unrelated.