Assuming the original is in binary, you group the digits in threes (from the right). This is similar to the use of comma separators between billions, and millions and thousands in decimal numbers.
So 100010001111 = 100,010,001,111
Now, convert each triplet into its octal equivalent using the following table:
000 = 0 001 = 1 010 = 2 011 = 3
100 = 4 101 = 5 110 = 6 111 = 7
Thus the original number, converted to octal, is 4217.
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
1111111010 = octal 1772
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
Octal: 56704534 Decimal: 12290396
117
0.375 = 3/8 = 0.3 in octal
(83)base10 to octal
It is 5AH actually, ie 90, 0132 in octal.
Octal = 56704534 Decimal = 12290396
Don't. 889 is not an octal number.
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
1111111010 = octal 1772
71
Octal = 52746757 Binary = 101010111100110111101111
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
Octal: 56704534 Decimal: 12290396
1470 octal = 001 100 111 000 binary