Assuming the original is in binary, you group the digits in threes (from the right). This is similar to the use of comma separators between billions, and millions and thousands in decimal numbers.
So 100010001111 = 100,010,001,111
Now, convert each triplet into its octal equivalent using the following table:
000 = 0 001 = 1 010 = 2 011 = 3
100 = 4 101 = 5 110 = 6 111 = 7
Thus the original number, converted to octal, is 4217.
1000 1000 1111 base 2 = 4217 base 8
1111111010 = octal 1772
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
Octal: 56704534 Decimal: 12290396
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
Yes, I can.
0.375 = 3/8 = 0.3 in octal
(83)base10 to octal
Don't. 889 is not an octal number.
It is 5AH actually, ie 90, 0132 in octal.
Octal = 56704534 Decimal = 12290396
1111111010 = octal 1772
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
71
Octal = 52746757 Binary = 101010111100110111101111
Octal: 56704534 Decimal: 12290396
yes its octal form is (101)to the base 8.
1470 octal = 001 100 111 000 binary