To round 6.59 to the nearest whole number, you look at the digit immediately to the right of the decimal point, which is 5. Since 5 is equal to or greater than 5, you round the whole number up by 1. Therefore, 6.59 rounded to the nearest whole number is 7.
82.375
65.9
It could be: 6*(4+659)
It is prime, it has no factors.
Yes, there are 659 Members of Parliament (MPs) in the House of Commons in the United Kingdom. This number can change due to boundary reviews or other legislative adjustments, but as of the latest information, 659 is the correct count. Each MP represents a specific parliamentary constituency.
82.375
Well, let's take a moment to appreciate the number 659. When we round it off to the nearest ten, we look at the digit in the tens place, which is 5. Since 5 is halfway between 0 and 10, we round up to the next ten, making it 660. Just like adding a happy little tree to complete a painting, rounding off numbers can give us a clearer picture.
700
700
Additive opposite = -659 Multiplicative opposite = 1/659 = 0.001517 (approx)
Infinitely many Numbers. EDIT: Every number below 659 will be smaller than 659.
65.9
No. The quotient of 659 and 9 is not a whole number.
Simply to look at the number and ask "what is the nearest 1000", or, "what is the nearest whole number? etc" Or follow the rules: Basically divide by (say,) 1000) add 1 if the decimal part is 0,5 or greater, and discard the decimal bit ("rounding"), and multiply back by the original divisor. So for example 658879 -> 658.879 -> 659 -> 659000 has been "rounded to the nearest 1000". Quite often people want to round to the nearest whole number, which simply means ignore the decimal bit if less than 0.5 , or add 1 unit if greater than 0.5 the throw away the decimal bits, for example 34.6 -> 35 . That's actually the same route as the first example, but of course multiplying by 1 first etc is a waste of time.
Yes. It has no factors.
It could be: 6*(4+659)
559559